Search This Blog

Monday, August 11, 2025

John Mearsheimer: Israel Lobby’s Influence on U.S. Policy as Powerful as Ever

John J. Mearsheimer, a renowned political scientist and professor at the University of Chicago, has long been a central figure in American foreign policy debates, especially for his critical analysis of U.S. support for Israel. Nearly two decades after co-authoring The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy with Stephen Walt, Mearsheimer continues to assert that the Israel lobby remains one of the most powerful and enduring forces shaping American policy in the Middle East — and that its influence is as strong, if not stronger, than ever.

Background: Who is John Mearsheimer?

John Mearsheimer is best known as one of the foremost proponents of the realist school of international relations, particularly the theory of offensive realism. According to this perspective, great powers are inherently driven to dominate the international system to ensure their own security and survival.

Yet, much of Mearsheimer's public attention has centered not on grand strategy per se, but on his work with Stephen Walt, particularly their 2006 article and subsequent 2007 book The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy. The central thesis was — and remains — controversial: that a loose but powerful coalition of pro-Israel individuals and organizations exerts disproportionate influence over American foreign policy, often pushing it in directions that are not aligned with broader U.S. strategic interests.

Defining the “Israel Lobby”

Mearsheimer and Walt defined the "Israel lobby" not as a centralized or conspiratorial group, but as a collection of individuals and organizations — including AIPAC (American Israel Public Affairs Committee), think tanks, journalists, Christian Zionist groups, and major donors — that work to steer U.S. foreign policy in a pro-Israel direction.

Importantly, they stressed that the lobby is not a monolith, nor is it exclusively Jewish. Rather, it is a diverse coalition unified by a commitment to ensuring strong U.S. support for Israel, often regardless of the policies pursued by Israeli governments.

The central argument was that the lobby stifles open debate about U.S.-Israel relations and plays a significant role in ensuring continued American diplomatic, military, and financial backing of Israel — even when such support undermines America’s credibility and strategic interests in the Middle East.

A Message That Sparked Controversy

When The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy was first published, it drew intense backlash from a wide range of commentators. Critics accused Mearsheimer and Walt of promoting conspiracy theories, ignoring the moral and strategic justifications for U.S. support for Israel, and downplaying the influence of other factors in Middle East policy.

Supporters of the book, however, saw it as a necessary challenge to a long-standing taboo: questioning the cost-benefit analysis of Washington’s unwavering commitment to Israel. Mearsheimer and Walt’s work was credited with opening the door to more critical conversations about the U.S.-Israel relationship — conversations that have since become more visible in both academic and political circles.

The Lobby’s Enduring Strength

Nearly two decades later, Mearsheimer has argued that the lobby’s influence has not waned — in fact, it may be more entrenched than ever. Despite shifting public opinion, especially among younger Americans and Democrats, official U.S. policy toward Israel has remained largely unchanged, even in the face of growing concerns about human rights and regional instability.

Mearsheimer points to a number of key developments as evidence of this ongoing influence:

  1. Unwavering Military Aid
    The U.S. continues to provide Israel with over $3.8 billion annually in military assistance, regardless of Israel’s domestic policies or its actions in Gaza and the West Bank. This aid is often guaranteed through multi-year agreements that are difficult to reverse, even amid growing international criticism of Israeli military operations.

  2. Diplomatic Shielding
    The United States frequently uses its veto power in the United Nations Security Council to block resolutions critical of Israel. This practice, Mearsheimer argues, serves Israeli interests at the expense of broader U.S. credibility and diplomatic relationships, especially in the Global South.

  3. Suppression of Political Dissent
    Pro-Palestinian voices in American political and academic life continue to face significant backlash. Mearsheimer has warned that the lobby contributes to a climate where criticism of Israel is often equated with anti-Semitism, thereby stifling legitimate debate and scholarship.

  4. Influence in Congress
    AIPAC and other pro-Israel organizations maintain a strong presence in Congress, shaping legislation and ensuring bipartisan support for Israel. Even lawmakers who express concern over Israeli policies often vote in line with the lobby’s positions, fearing political and financial repercussions.

Gaza and the Shifting Discourse

Recent events, particularly the 2023–2025 escalation in Gaza, have reignited debate over the U.S.-Israel relationship. The Israeli military's operations in the densely populated enclave, resulting in thousands of civilian casualties, have drawn unprecedented international condemnation. Yet, the U.S. has remained Israel's staunchest defender, continuing military support and opposing ceasefire resolutions.

Mearsheimer argues that this ongoing support, despite the reputational costs to the United States, illustrates how effective the lobby remains in shaping policy. While segments of the American public — particularly progressives and younger voters — have become more critical of Israel, these shifts have not yet translated into significant policy changes.

He also emphasizes that this dynamic harms U.S. interests by alienating Arab and Muslim allies, undermining America's position as an honest broker in the region, and fueling anti-American sentiment that can foster extremism.

Realism vs. Ideology

As a realist, Mearsheimer has consistently framed his critique not in moral terms, but strategic ones. He does not deny Israel’s right to exist or its right to defend itself. However, he argues that blind support for Israel — particularly in moments when Israeli policy is aggressive, expansionist, or out of step with international norms — runs counter to the national interest of the United States.

From a realist perspective, U.S. foreign policy should prioritize balance of power, regional stability, and long-term strategic interests. According to Mearsheimer, the current U.S.-Israel relationship violates these principles by subordinating broader strategic concerns to the preferences of a small but powerful domestic interest group.

Growing Awareness, But Little Change

While academic and media discourse has become more open to discussing the Israel lobby’s role, Mearsheimer remains skeptical about the prospects for real policy shifts. He argues that entrenched institutional dynamics, donor influence, and political inertia make meaningful change difficult.

He has noted, however, that cracks in the consensus are beginning to show. Progressive politicians like Bernie Sanders, Rashida Tlaib, and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez have voiced open criticism of Israeli policy. Public opinion polls show increasing sympathy for Palestinians, especially among younger Americans. These trends suggest that while the lobby’s influence remains powerful, its long-term hold on U.S. foreign policy may not be absolute.

Conclusion

John Mearsheimer’s analysis of the Israel lobby remains one of the most provocative and enduring critiques in the landscape of American foreign policy. While deeply controversial, his arguments have sparked a much-needed conversation about the relationship between domestic lobbying groups and national strategy.

Nearly 20 years after The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy, Mearsheimer maintains that the lobby’s power has not diminished — and that its continued influence represents a serious challenge to rational, interest-based policymaking in the United States.

As global dynamics evolve and regional conflicts escalate, whether the U.S. can — or will — recalibrate its Middle East policy remains an open and pressing question.

Sunday, August 3, 2025

Ilan PappƩ: Why does the Israel lobby still exist?

šŸ“– Introduction: Who Is Ilan PappĆ©?

Ilan PappĆ© is a provocative Israeli-born historian, part of the “New Historians” movement that reevaluated Zionist narratives and the Nakba as a process of ethnic cleansing Wikipedia+15Wikipedia+15El PaĆ­s+15. Exiled to the UK, he remains a fierce critic of Israel’s founding mythologies and international legitimation strategies WikipediaThe White ReviewThe Electronic Intifada.


šŸ”Ž PappĆ©’s View: What Is the Israel Lobby?

In PappĆ©’s analysis, the “Israel lobby” or “Zionist lobby” is not a single organization, but a multifaceted coalition of individuals, institutions, ideological groups, and Christian Zionist networks spanning both sides of the Atlantic The University of Western AustraliaBrave New EuropeSimon & Schuster. It includes formal parliamentary bodies like AIPAC in the U.S. and Conservative/Labour Friends of Israel in the U.K., alongside media, academic, religious, and lobbying machinery Wikipedia+12The University of Western Australia+12againstthecurrent.org+12.


šŸ› ️ Why Does It Still Exist?

1. Guarding Legitimacy and Suppressing Delegitimization

PappĆ© argues that Israel relies heavily on Western moral approval. Even though it is materially powerful, its moral legitimacy continues to erode under allegations of apartheid and human rights abuses. The lobby’s primary role has become fighting delegitimization by controlling narratives, influencing elites, and censoring dissent within academia, media, and politics Cadena SER+5The University of Western Australia+5El PaĆ­s+5.

2. Long‑Standing Structure and Elite Influence

Since the early 20th century, pro‑Zionist movements have focused on influencing elites—politicians, media figures, intellectuals—through a combination of patronage tactics, intimidation, and access. PappĆ© notes how lobby groups can quietly reward or punish politicians, shaping policy outcomes without electoral accountability El PaĆ­sBrave New EuropeSimon & Schuster.

3. Alliances with the Military‑Industrial Complex

The lobby has been adept at aligning its agenda with U.S. military and arms industry interests. Even when arms sales to Arab states continue, the lobby often demands more advanced weaponry be sent to Israel, regardless of actual Israeli requests. This serves to demonstrate continued influence—keeping the lobby’s power apparatus visibly intact PopularResistance.Org.

4. Psychological Need for Power

PappĆ© argues that over decades the lobby has become an institution whose raison d’ĆŖtre is sustaining its own power, not merely supporting Israeli state interests. Even when restricting arm sales isn’t possible, the lobby pushes for symbolic victories—more congressional resolutions, more funding—to assert its relevance PopularResistance.OrgEl PaĆ­s.


⚠️ Emerging Cracks in the Lobby’s Dominance

PappƩ identifies several challenges that weaken the coherence and long-term influence of the lobby:

  • Partisan polarization: The lobby’s close alignment with the Republican party, especially under Donald Trump, has alienated many younger American Jews and widened its ideological brittleness Cadena SERWikipedia.

  • Generational shift: Younger Jewish Americans are increasingly alienated by Israeli policies and more sympathetic to Palestinian rights—eroding the lobby’s traditional support base Cadena SER.

  • Public backlash after October 7: The live-streamed aftermath of Hamas’s attack and Israeli military response shattered many of the lobby’s narrative frames. PappĆ© suggests this moment exposed its propaganda machine, making its previous methods far less effective in shaping opinion PopularResistance.OrgThe Electronic IntifadaCadena SER.


🧭 The Central Question: Why Does Israel Still Crave Legitimacy?

PappƩ provocatively asks why, despite military and economic might, Israel continues to depend on a Western moral umbrella. He suggests that this stems from a deep-seated insecurity rooted in its origins: ethnic cleansing, occupation, and dispossession are historically controversial, and efforts to silence these critiques persist to this day againstthecurrent.orgThe White ReviewWikipedia.

He also links Europe’s reluctance to challenge Israel with unresolved guilt over the Holocaust and a desire to avoid confronting difficult histories. In the U.S., combined forces of Christian Zionist ideology, Jewish lobby power, and arms industry interests reinforce this defensive posture The White ReviewThe University of Western Australia.


🧩 Hallmarks of the Lobby in Action Today

• Silencing Critics

From media anchors to academics, challenges to Israeli policy are often met with career threats or public ostracization. PappƩ characterizes this behavior as institutionalized censorship, backed by both financial and reputational tools El PaƭsThe University of Western Australia.

• Controlling Knowledge Production

Universities, think tanks, seminars, and funding bodies are strategically influenced to block Palestine-related narratives. PappƩ depicts this as a concerted attempt to reshape knowledge warfare, not simply political debate El PaƭsSimon & Schuster.

• Preserving Political Access

Lobby groups maintain deep access to lawmakers. AIPAC’s role in mobilizing campaign support or orchestrating legislative language remains a defining symbol of the lobby’s influence on policymaking WikipediaSimon & Schuster.


šŸŽÆ Is This Lobby Still Net Positive for Israel?

PappƩ argues the lobby has become counterproductive:

  • It increasingly divorces itself from the core mission of national survival, almost seeking power for its own sake.

  • At times it amplifies calls for arms or policy stances that Israel itself did not ask for—simply to demonstrate its continued clout PopularResistance.OrgEl PaĆ­s.

  • As public opinion shifts—especially among younger diasporic communities—the lobby’s traditional tools lose force, and may contribute to further alienation and backlash Cadena SERPopularResistance.Org.

PappĆ© concludes with cautious optimism: there is a tipping point ahead, where moral erosion combined with rising civil resistance may render the lobby’s methods obsolete—or confront them with legal and grassroots challenges rather than elite influence againstthecurrent.orgEl PaĆ­s.


🧠 Conclusion: The Israel Lobby — Legacy, Power, and Decline

  • Ilan PappĆ© views the Israel lobby as a sophisticated, long‑built structure founded not only on Zionist activism but on elite influence, Christian Zionism, and structural incentives within Western politics.

  • Its persistence stems from strategic interest in preserving Israel’s Western legitimacy, an existential necessity given ongoing occupation and accusations of apartheid.

  • However, its ownership of narratives is fraying: partisan polarization, generational disaffection, and regional backlash challenge its dominance.

  • Ultimately, PappĆ© invites readers not just to critique Israeli policies, but to understand the inner logic of a lobby that fights for legitimacy, often regardless of Israel’s own trajectory.


Suggested Further Reading

Friday, July 25, 2025

Ilan PappƩ: The Israel Lobby Is Real. This Is How It Works

Ilan PappĆ©—an Israeli historian of the so‑called “New Historians” school—is one of the most outspoken critics of Zionism and Israeli state policy. Over the past decade, he has shifted from mainstream academic circles in Israel to a vocal activist and exile, currently based at the University of Exeter in the United Kingdom. PappĆ© argues unambiguously that the Israel lobby is not a myth or an exaggeration, but a powerful, multi‑faceted network that has shaped Western politics, elite opinion, and public discourse in favor of Israel (and Zionist goals) for over a century.


Who Is Ilan PappĆ©?

Born in Haifa in 1954, PappĆ© began his career as a mainstream historian, investigating the archives of 1948 and uncovering documents that contradicted the dominant Zionist narrative about the creation of the state of Israel. These records included military orders—such as Plan Dalet—that mandated the forced expulsion of Palestinians, which PappĆ© interpreted as evidence of ethnic cleansing El PaĆ­s+15RFI+15Wikipedia+15.

Over time, his work became increasingly politicized. He was expelled from his academic position in Israel after supporting academic boycott campaigns—ironically including of his own university—and in 1999 ran for Knesset with the Communist-linked Hadash list Wikipedia. PappĆ© now lives in exile, deeply skeptical of the mainstream Zionist interpretation. He insists that the Israeli-Palestinian conflict must be understood as a settler‑colonial project, not merely a clash of nationalisms WikipediaRFI.


The Lobby Is Real: A Historical Overview

In his most recent book, Lobbying for Zionism on Both Sides of the Atlantic, PappƩ sets out a comprehensive narrative of how Zionism became deeply embedded in Western political elites through a concerted network of organizations, donors, clergy, media operatives, and influential individuals Cadena SER+10Wikipedia+10MR Online+10.

  • Origins in the 19th century and early 20th century: Zionist leaders leveraged both religiously motivated Christian Zionists and secular philanthropists—sometimes including antisemites—to advocate for the establishment of a Jewish homeland. Figures such as Balfour and Lloyd George are portrayed as instrumental in constructing diplomatic support for Zionism, even when their motivations diverged sharply MR Online.

  • Institutionalizing the lobby: Organizations like AIPAC in the United States, Labour Friends of Israel and Conservative Friends of Israel in the UK, don’t merely support Israel—they enforce alignment between Western political elites and Israeli policy through funding, access, and pressure The University of Western Australia.

PappĆ© emphasizes the lobbying system’s evolution: once focused on establishment elites, it now also targets universities, media, religious institutions, and local government bodies—aggressively suppressing dissenting or pro‑Palestinian narratives The White Review+15The University of Western Australia+15Brave New Europe+15.


How the Israel Lobby Works

1. Targeting Political Elites

The central role of AIPAC in the U.S. and similar groups in the UK is a testament to how much these organizations have influenced policymaking. These lobbies often judge political leaders not by policy performance but by their obedience to pro‑Israel directives—even when those directives conflict with peace initiatives like the Oslo Accords Brave New EuropeMR Onlinechrishedges.podbean.com.

2. Financial and Institutional Leverage

PappĆ© documents how well‑funded donors and institutional affiliations are used to cultivate support and silence critics. Political leaders, university administrations, and media outlets fearful of losing funding or credibility often self‑censor criticism of Israel or Zionism El PaĆ­sMR Online.

3. Controlling Narratives in Academia and Media

In academic settings, PappĆ© charges that pro‑Israel lobby efforts suppress scholarly critiques of the Israeli state. He notes that Israeli institutions are implicated in military research, and silencing dissent within universities has become increasingly aggressive—especially following October 7, 2023 The GuardianJewish Voice for LabourWikipedia.

4. Repressing Dissent in Civil Society

According to PappĆ©, the lobby is now most intensely focused on controlling social movements, online discourse, and grassroots activism. As public sympathy for Palestine grows in younger generations, the lobby’s strategy has pivoted to preventing such trends from reaching institutions like churches, universities, and municipal bodies El PaĆ­sThe University of Western Australia.


Why the Lobby Exists—and Why It Is So Anxious

PappĆ© argues that the Israel lobby is not just about protecting Israel—it has become an autonomous power structure that preserves Zionist influence itself. As the moral legitimacy of Israel erodes—due to allegations of apartheid and repression—the lobby shifts toward discrediting critics and suppressing solidarity movements to preserve legitimacy for its own sake El PaĆ­sEl PaĆ­sMR OnlineThe University of Western Australia.

This anxiety is most evident in the backlash against figures like PappĆ© himself: interrogated by U.S. Homeland Security, removed from broadcast opportunities, and subjected to campaigns of intimidation—tactics he interprets to reflect the lobby’s fear of losing grip over public discourse Home+15wsws.org+15The University of Western Australia+15.


Critiques and Controversies

PappĆ© is highly controversial—even among other scholars of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Critics such as Benny Morris have accused him of distorting historical facts and deliberately allowing ideology to guide his historical interpretation. Morris described him as “sloppy” at best and “dishonest” at worst, and accused PappĆ© of fabricating or mischaracterizing archival evidence Reddit+1Wikipedia+1.

PappĆ© himself has acknowledged that historical objectivity is impossible and that he frames history through a political lens. He sees history as ideological narrative, not undisputed truth—a view that many traditional historians vehemently reject RedditReddit.

Despite critique, PappĆ© remains influential in pro‑Palestinian, anti‑Zionist circles. His emphasis on moral urgency and his willingness to tie academic work to political activism resonate with many activists worldwide RedditWikipedia.


Conclusion: A Real Lobby with Real Impact

Ilan PappĆ© maintains that the Israel lobby is a tangible and highly effective force operating on both sides of the Atlantic to secure unwavering Western support for Israeli state policy. From British leadership in the early 20th century to AIPAC’s dominance in modern U.S. politics, PappĆ© describes a century-long machinery of influence grounded in financial power, elite co-option, and ideological conformity.

He argues that as Israel’s moral legitimacy wanes—under criticism of apartheid, occupation, and repression—the lobby’s focus shifts toward suppressing dissenting narratives and preserving its own power base. The outcome, he believes, is a political and intellectual environment in the West that severely restricts legitimate critique of Israel.

Whether one views his work as powerful truth-telling or deeply biased polemic, PappĆ©’s essential position remains clear: Yes, the Israel lobby is real—and it shapes not just policy but how we think about the Israeli‑Palestinian conflict.

Saturday, July 19, 2025

The Mahdi in Sunni and Shia Islam: A Comparative View

In both Sunni and Shia Islam, the belief in a divinely guided leader who will appear at the end of times to bring justice and restore true religion is a deeply rooted part of eschatology. This figure is known as the Mahdi—a term meaning "the Guided One." Though both sects believe in the Mahdi, their narratives differ significantly in his identity, lineage, role, and the context of his appearance.

This article explores the similarities and differences in the Sunni and Shia understandings of the Mahdi, offering insight into how a shared concept can evolve into distinct theological traditions.


Origins of the Mahdi Concept

The concept of the Mahdi is not explicitly mentioned in the Qur'an but is found in various hadiths (sayings of the Prophet Muhammad). The term "Mahdi" gained prominence in Islamic thought during the early centuries of Islam, particularly in response to political upheaval, injustice, and the longing for righteous leadership.

Both Sunnis and Shias believe the Mahdi will emerge in the End Times to establish justice, defeat evil, and lead Muslims to victory. However, how he is identified and what his mission entails are where the schools of thought begin to diverge.


The Sunni View of the Mahdi

In Sunni Islam, the Mahdi is generally seen as a future righteous leader who will be born in the end times. He is not considered divine or infallible but will be inspired by God to lead with justice. Sunni hadith literature contains numerous narrations about the Mahdi, particularly from collections such as Abu Dawud, Tirmidhi, and Ibn Majah.

Key Characteristics in Sunni Belief:

  • Lineage: The Mahdi will be a descendant of the Prophet Muhammad through his daughter Fatimah, and thus part of the Prophet’s household (Ahl al-Bayt).

  • Name: His name will be Muhammad, and his father’s name will be Abdullah, mirroring the Prophet’s name.

  • Timing: He will appear during a time of great turmoil, injustice, and widespread corruption.

  • Mission: He will fight against tyranny, establish a just society, and lead the Muslim community. Some traditions also mention that he will rule for seven to nine years.

  • Relationship with Jesus: In Sunni eschatology, the Mahdi’s era coincides with the return of Jesus (Isa), who will descend from heaven, kill the Antichrist (Dajjal), and pray behind the Mahdi, signifying his support.

In this narrative, the Mahdi is not a supernatural figure, nor is he believed to be alive or hidden. He is a man born in the future who rises in response to global crises.


The Shia View of the Mahdi

In Shia Islam, particularly within the Twelver (Ithna ‘Ashari) tradition—the largest branch of Shia Islam—the belief in the Mahdi is central and well-defined. The Mahdi is identified as Muhammad ibn Hasan al-Askari, the Twelfth Imam, born in 868 CE.

Key Characteristics in Shia Belief:

  • Lineage and Identity: The Mahdi is already born and is the son of the eleventh Imam, Hasan al-Askari. He is believed to be a direct descendant of the Prophet Muhammad through Fatimah and Imam Ali.

  • Occultation (Ghaybah): According to Twelver Shia belief, the Mahdi entered a state of occultation—first a minor occultation (874–941 CE), during which he communicated with followers through deputies, and then a major occultation, in which he remains hidden from the world until God permits his reappearance.

  • Supernatural Role: The Mahdi is considered an infallible, divinely guided leader, who has a unique spiritual status among humans. His reappearance is a cosmic event.

  • Return and Global Justice: When he returns, he will fill the world with justice and truth, dismantling systems of oppression. He will lead a global revolution, punish wrongdoers, and restore the true path of Islam.

  • Association with Jesus: Like the Sunni narrative, Shia eschatology includes the return of Jesus, who will support the Mahdi in his mission and confirm his leadership.

The Twelfth Imam is more than just a future leader in Shia belief; he is the living Imam, hidden from view but still active in guiding the faithful through divine means.


Similarities Between the Two Views

Despite their doctrinal differences, Sunni and Shia views of the Mahdi share several key elements:

  • He is from the family of the Prophet Muhammad.

  • He appears in a time of global injustice and moral decay.

  • His mission is to establish justice, equity, and the true teachings of Islam.

  • His era coincides with the return of Jesus (Isa), who supports him.

These overlapping beliefs reflect a shared yearning for divine justice and righteous leadership—a sentiment that has shaped Islamic spirituality and politics for centuries.


Differences and Points of Divergence

  1. Existence vs. Future Birth:

    • Shia: The Mahdi is already born and in occultation.

    • Sunni: The Mahdi will be born in the future.

  2. Nature and Status:

    • Shia: The Mahdi is an infallible Imam, part of a divinely appointed lineage.

    • Sunni: The Mahdi is a righteous human leader, not infallible.

  3. Role in Shia Political Thought:

    • The Shia concept of Wilayat al-Faqih (Guardianship of the Jurist), especially in Iran, is based on the idea that religious scholars act as stewards during the Mahdi’s occultation.

    • Sunni Islam does not typically have this intermediary governance theory tied to eschatology.

  4. Sectarian Tensions:

    • In some extremist or politicized circles, Shia and Sunni apocalyptic views have been weaponized, with each side interpreting the Mahdi's mission through sectarian lenses. For example, some militant Sunni groups accuse the Shia Mahdi narrative of being hostile to Sunnis, while some radical Shia narratives depict the Mahdi as purging injustice—including those seen as opposing the Ahl al-Bayt.

However, these are not universally accepted views and are often fueled by political conflict rather than core doctrine.


Conclusion: One Mahdi, Many Interpretations

The Mahdi remains a powerful symbol of hope and divine justice for Muslims around the world. Whether seen as a future leader yet to be born or an existing Imam in occultation, he represents the promise that tyranny will not endure and that truth will ultimately prevail.

While the Sunni and Shia traditions differ in their understanding of the Mahdi’s identity and role, the underlying message is the same: the world is heading toward a climactic moment of moral reckoning, and divine guidance will illuminate the path forward.

In an age of rising extremism and sectarian division, it is important to approach these beliefs with scholarship, empathy, and nuance, avoiding sensationalism and focusing instead on the shared spiritual longing that unites the Muslim world.