The Antichrist claims to be God Acting as The Twelth Imam of the Shiite Muslims!

The subject of the Twelfth Imam, the Antichrist, and their potential relationship with the Dome of the Rock is complex, weaving elements of theology, eschatology, and apocalyptic prophecy from both Islamic and Christian traditions. In this article, I will explore how the idea of the Twelfth Imam (the Mahdi) intertwines with Antichrist narratives, the significance of the Dome of the Rock as a prophetic site, and the surprising possibility of an alliance between Shiite Muslims and Zionists within this prophetic framework. Although this idea merges theological views that are not traditionally linked, the scenario offers a gripping depiction of the end times.

1. The Concept of the Twelfth Imam in Shia Islam

In Shia Islam, particularly among Twelver Shia Muslims, the belief in the "Mahdi" (the Guided One) plays a pivotal role in eschatology. The Mahdi is expected to be the last of the Twelve Imams, a line of divinely appointed leaders. The Twelfth Imam, Muhammad al-Mahdi, is believed to have gone into occultation (disappearance) around 941 CE and will return as a messianic figure to bring justice and peace, unite the faithful, and restore the true teachings of Islam. His return will usher in a golden age, according to Shia theology, and he will establish righteousness across the earth.

The Twelfth Imam is not merely a savior for Shia Muslims but also represents hope for humanity. He is seen as a divinely appointed figure who will conquer the forces of evil, settle global injustices, and usher in the Day of Judgment. For many Shia Muslims, his reappearance is central to their religious expectation. However, the potential overlap between the Mahdi and the Antichrist figure, from a Christian eschatological view, is a fascinating – and controversial – concept.

2. The Antichrist: Dajjal in Islam and Christian Eschatology

The Antichrist (or Dajjal in Islamic eschatology) is a figure associated with deception, destruction, and opposition to divine truth. In Christianity, the Antichrist is prophesied to arise before the return of Jesus Christ, misleading many and setting himself up as a false god. Similarly, in Islamic eschatology, Dajjal is a one-eyed deceiver who will perform miracles, claim to be God, and lead humanity astray. His arrival is seen as a major sign of the end times.

What makes this hypothetical scenario intriguing is the idea that the Antichrist might disguise himself as the awaited Mahdi, thus deceiving both Shia Muslims and Zionists. This figure could create unity among groups that have traditionally been seen as antagonistic – Shiite Muslims and Zionist Jews – under the guise of bringing about divine order, only to later reveal his true purpose of destruction and domination.

3. The Dome of the Rock and the ‘Holy of Holies’

The Dome of the Rock, situated on the Temple Mount (known as Haram al-Sharif in Arabic) in Jerusalem, is one of the most sacred sites in the world. For Muslims, it marks the spot where the Prophet Muhammad ascended to heaven during the Isra and Mi'raj. For Jews, the Temple Mount is the holiest place, as it is believed to have housed the First and Second Temples, with the Holy of Holies being the inner sanctuary that contained the Ark of the Covenant.

According to some apocalyptic interpretations, the Antichrist will enter the Holy of Holies within the Temple and declare himself to be God. Although the Holy of Holies no longer physically exists within the Dome of the Rock today, this scenario suggests that a future leader – falsely identified as the Twelfth Imam – might symbolically or literally claim divinity at this sacred location. If such a figure were to take control of the Temple Mount and declare himself God (Allah), it could set off a chain of events fulfilling end-time prophecies from both Islamic and Christian perspectives.

4. An Unlikely Alliance: Shiite Muslims and Zionists Rallying Behind the Antichrist

One of the more startling aspects of this scenario is the idea of an alliance between Shiite Muslims and Zionists. Historically, these groups have been adversaries. The Islamic Republic of Iran, which champions Shia Islam, has long been in opposition to the state of Israel. However, if a figure claiming to be the Mahdi were to emerge, he could inspire unity across religious and political divides, particularly by performing signs and wonders that convince the masses of his divine authority.

This leader, masquerading as both the Twelfth Imam and a messianic figure for Jews, might convince Shiite Muslims and Zionists to follow him. His promises of peace and justice could resonate with both groups, drawing them together into an unexpected alliance.

However, from a Christian eschatological point of view, such a leader would not be a true messiah but the Antichrist, deceiving the world into believing in a false salvation. His entry into the Dome of the Rock and declaration of divinity would fulfill the prophecy of the "abomination of desolation" mentioned in the Book of Daniel and referenced by Jesus in the New Testament. This act would mark the beginning of a period of unparalleled tribulation and chaos.

5. Deception and Betrayal: The Unmasking of the Antichrist

Once this leader declares himself to be God inside the Dome of the Rock, the true nature of his mission would become apparent. His miraculous deeds and promises of unity would unravel into tyranny and oppression. The alliance between Shiite Muslims and Zionists, forged on the belief that they were following a divine leader, would collapse as the reality of his deception becomes evident.

This scenario aligns with certain interpretations of Islamic and Christian eschatology, where the Antichrist or Dajjal will initially appear as a savior but will ultimately reveal himself as a deceiver. Jesus Christ (known as Isa in Islam) is prophesied to return and defeat the Antichrist, restoring true faith and justice.

6. Conclusion: A Prophetic Warning or Imaginative Speculation?

While the idea of the Twelfth Imam being confused with the Antichrist and entering the Dome of the Rock to claim divinity is not rooted in traditional Islamic teachings, it serves as a speculative fusion of end-time scenarios from various religious traditions. The concept of Shiite Muslims and Zionists uniting under a false messiah adds another layer of intrigue, suggesting that in times of great uncertainty, even historical enemies might rally behind a charismatic leader.

This scenario offers a cautionary message about the dangers of deception and false promises, especially in a world longing for peace and justice. Whether taken as a literal possibility or as imaginative speculation, it challenges us to consider how religious and political identities might shift in unexpected ways in the face of global crises.

Ultimately, it serves as a reminder to remain vigilant against deception, no matter how appealing the promise of unity and salvation may seem. In the end, the true test lies not in miracles or political alliances but in discerning the truth amid chaos.

Treacherous Alliance: The Secret Dealings of Iran, Israel, and the United States

Treacherous Alliance: The Secret Dealings of Iran, Israel, and the United States, authored by Trita Parsi, offers a deep exploration of the clandestine cooperation between Iran and Israel during the era of Ayatollah Khomeini, despite their public hostility. Parsi, an expert on Middle East geopolitics, argues that the relationship between the two nations during the 1980s was characterized by pragmatism rather than ideological enmity. This period, which followed the 1979 Iranian Revolution, saw the breakdown of formal ties between the two countries as Khomeini’s regime embraced anti-Zionist rhetoric. However, beneath this surface of antagonism, Parsi reveals that Iran and Israel continued to engage in covert cooperation.

Historical Context: Pre-Revolutionary Ties

Prior to the 1979 Iranian Revolution, Iran and Israel enjoyed a robust, albeit discreet, alliance. Under the rule of Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, Iran was a key player in the Middle East and maintained close ties with Israel, driven by mutual strategic interests. Both countries were non-Arab states surrounded by hostile Arab nations, and they saw cooperation as a way to counterbalance the influence of pan-Arabism and Soviet expansion. Israel provided Iran with military technology and intelligence support, while Iran, rich in oil, supplied Israel with crucial energy resources.

This relationship was built on pragmatism rather than shared ideological principles. The Shah, while conservative, did not espouse the hardline anti-Zionism that would later define the Iranian regime under Khomeini. For Israel, the alliance with Iran was vital to its survival in a hostile region, providing a foothold in the Middle East.

The Iranian Revolution and Ideological Shifts

The 1979 Iranian Revolution brought a sharp ideological shift to Iran’s foreign policy. Ayatollah Khomeini, who led the revolution, positioned his regime in direct opposition to both the United States and Israel. Khomeini’s Islamic Republic adopted a vehemently anti-Zionist stance, framing Israel as a puppet of Western imperialism and a threat to the Muslim world. In the new Iranian political lexicon, Israel became the "Little Satan," while the U.S. was the "Great Satan."

Despite these public denunciations, Parsi argues that Iran’s geopolitical pragmatism remained intact, especially during the 1980s, when Iran was engaged in a protracted and bloody war with Iraq. The Iran-Iraq War (1980–1988) was a critical period for Iran, and survival, rather than ideology, dictated the country’s foreign policy decisions. Parsi's Treacherous Alliance examines how Iran, desperate for military equipment and economic support during the war, covertly reached out to Israel for assistance.

Covert Cooperation: The Iran-Contra Affair

The most striking example of this secret collaboration was the Iran-Contra affair, an arms-for-hostages scandal that came to light in the mid-1980s. Despite their public enmity, Israel acted as a middleman in supplying arms to Iran, which was fighting Saddam Hussein’s Iraq, a country that posed a more immediate threat to both Iran and Israel. The arrangement was largely facilitated by the Reagan administration, which hoped to secure the release of American hostages held by Hezbollah, an Iranian-backed militant group in Lebanon.

Through these covert arms deals, Israel provided Iran with weapons and spare parts for its military, which had been heavily reliant on American technology during the Shah’s reign. In exchange, Iran would use its influence over Hezbollah to help release American hostages. This secret alliance revealed the extent to which both countries were willing to prioritize their immediate strategic needs over ideological consistency.

Parsi highlights the underlying pragmatism that defined the Iran-Israel relationship during this period. For Israel, the possibility of a resurgent Iraq under Saddam Hussein was a greater concern than Iran’s anti-Zionist rhetoric. Iran, isolated and struggling against a well-armed Iraqi military, saw the need for any assistance, even from its proclaimed enemy, Israel. The Iran-Contra affair demonstrated that realpolitik often trumped ideology in the complex geopolitics of the Middle East.

Ideology vs. Pragmatism: The Central Argument

A key argument in Treacherous Alliance is that despite the deeply entrenched ideological differences between Israel and post-revolutionary Iran, both nations have repeatedly shown a willingness to engage in pragmatic cooperation when it served their strategic interests. While Khomeini’s regime publicly championed the Palestinian cause and lambasted Israel as an illegitimate state, Iran’s leadership recognized that, in certain contexts, collaboration with Israel was necessary for its survival.

This duality—public animosity and covert collaboration—is central to Parsi’s analysis. He argues that while ideology plays an important role in shaping Iran’s foreign policy rhetoric, it is not the sole driver of its actions. When faced with existential threats, Iran has shown a capacity for pragmatism, even when that pragmatism conflicts with its ideological pronouncements.

Similarly, Israel, which views Iran as a long-term strategic threat, has also demonstrated a willingness to cooperate when it sees an opportunity to mitigate more immediate dangers. In the 1980s, this was exemplified by Israel’s support for Iran against Iraq, which Israel viewed as a more pressing regional threat at the time. This pragmatic approach, however, did not last, and by the 1990s, the relationship between Iran and Israel had deteriorated further, particularly as Iran increased its support for groups like Hezbollah, which directly targeted Israeli interests.

The Post-Khomeini Era: Rising Tensions

In the years following the Iran-Iraq War, the cooperation between Iran and Israel diminished as Iran became more assertive in its regional ambitions. The rise of Hezbollah in Lebanon, backed by Iranian arms and funding, created a new front in the conflict between Israel and Iran. Hezbollah’s attacks on Israel, particularly during the 2006 Lebanon War, underscored the growing influence of Iran in the Levant and its commitment to opposing Israel’s regional dominance.

Parsi’s Treacherous Alliance concludes by examining how the balance between ideology and pragmatism has continued to shape Iran-Israel relations. While overt cooperation has ceased, both countries remain locked in a complex dance of hostility and occasional covert engagement. Iran’s pursuit of nuclear capabilities and Israel’s repeated efforts to thwart them through military and diplomatic means have further solidified the enmity between the two nations.

Conclusion

Trita Parsi’s Treacherous Alliance offers a nuanced exploration of the Iran-Israel relationship, challenging the simplistic view that their enmity is solely driven by ideology. Instead, Parsi argues that both countries have, at various points, prioritized strategic interests over ideological purity. This pragmatic cooperation, especially during Khomeini’s era, highlights the complexities of Middle Eastern geopolitics, where alliances can shift rapidly depending on the circumstances. As tensions between Iran and Israel continue to shape the region, understanding the historical roots of their relationship is crucial for grasping the current dynamics of conflict and cooperation in the Middle East.

"Surah Al-Kahf and the Modern Age" by Imran N. Hosein: An Analysis of the Antichrist (Dajjal)

Imran N. Hosein, a renowned Islamic scholar, is widely known for his analysis of contemporary issues in light of Islamic eschatology. One of his most notable works, "Surah Al-Kahf and the Modern Age," delves deeply into the teachings of the 18th chapter of the Quran, Al-Kahf (The Cave), and its relevance to the challenges of our time. A central theme in Hosein's interpretation is the figure of the Antichrist, known in Islamic tradition as Dajjal. This article explores how Imran N. Hosein’s book relates Surah Al-Kahf to the concept of the Dajjal, shedding light on the insights and warnings that this Quranic chapter offers for the modern age.

Introduction to Surah Al-Kahf

Surah Al-Kahf is one of the most significant chapters in the Quran, particularly concerning the trials and tribulations of the end times. It tells the stories of the People of the Cave, the owner of the two gardens, Prophet Moses (Musa) and Khidr, and Dhul-Qarnayn, a righteous ruler. These narratives are filled with profound lessons that transcend time, addressing themes of faith, knowledge, wealth, power, and the unseen reality.

The Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) emphasized the importance of Surah Al-Kahf in the context of the end times. He encouraged Muslims to recite this chapter every Friday and highlighted that it provides protection against the trials of Dajjal. This connection between Surah Al-Kahf and Dajjal forms the basis of Imran N. Hosein’s exploration, making it clear that understanding this Surah is crucial for comprehending the challenges posed by Dajjal in the modern world.

Imran N. Hosein’s Perspective on Dajjal

Imran N. Hosein approaches the concept of Dajjal not merely as a mythical figure or a future event but as a dynamic process already at work in the world today. According to Hosein, Dajjal is a complex phenomenon that manifests itself through the ideological, economic, political, and technological systems that dominate the modern age. He argues that the influence of Dajjal can be seen in the secular and materialistic worldview that has taken root, leading humanity away from spiritual and moral values.

In "Surah Al-Kahf and the Modern Age," Hosein presents Dajjal as an entity whose deception is already unfolding in the present era. He emphasizes that Dajjal's ultimate goal is to create a world that denies the existence of God, promotes materialism, and enslaves humanity through various means of control. Therefore, he asserts that the stories in Surah Al-Kahf provide valuable guidance for recognizing and resisting Dajjal's influence.

The Four Stories of Surah Al-Kahf and Their Relevance to Dajjal

Imran N. Hosein’s interpretation of the four stories in Surah Al-Kahf reveals how each narrative offers insights into different aspects of Dajjal’s deception.

The People of the Cave (Ashab Al-Kahf): The first story is about a group of young believers who sought refuge in a cave to protect their faith from a tyrannical king who demanded that they abandon their monotheistic beliefs. They slept in the cave for centuries and awoke to find that their society had changed.

Hosein relates this story to the challenges faced by believers in the modern age, where maintaining one’s faith is increasingly difficult due to the secular and materialistic environment. The story of the People of the Cave symbolizes the importance of withdrawing from a corrupt society to preserve one's faith, much like the challenges posed by Dajjal, who seeks to lead people away from their religious and moral principles.

The Story of the Owner of the Two Gardens: The second story is about a wealthy man who was arrogant and ungrateful, believing that his wealth and power were permanent. He failed to recognize that everything he had was a blessing from God and could be taken away at any moment.

Hosein interprets this story as a warning against the dangers of materialism and arrogance, traits that are amplified in the modern world. The influence of Dajjal is evident in the way contemporary society prioritizes wealth, status, and luxury, often at the expense of spiritual values. The lesson here is to recognize the temporary nature of worldly possessions and to remain humble and grateful to God.

The Story of Moses (Musa) and Khidr: The third narrative involves Prophet Moses' journey with Khidr, a mysterious figure who teaches Moses about the limitations of human knowledge. Moses witnesses events that seem unjust or inexplicable but eventually learns that there is a divine wisdom behind them.

Imran N. Hosein highlights this story as a reminder that there is more to reality than what meets the eye. In the modern age, where science and technology are often seen as the ultimate sources of knowledge, this story serves as a reminder of the limitations of human understanding. The Dajjalic system encourages people to believe only in what is observable and measurable, thereby denying the unseen dimensions of existence. The story of Moses and Khidr teaches the importance of humility, patience, and faith in divine wisdom.

The Story of Dhul-Qarnayn: The final story in Surah Al-Kahf is about Dhul-Qarnayn, a just ruler who traveled the earth and used his power to establish justice and protect people from the threat posed by Gog and Magog (Ya'juj and Ma'juj).

Hosein draws parallels between Dhul-Qarnayn’s actions and the need for righteous leadership in the face of Dajjal’s influence. He argues that the story exemplifies the importance of using power responsibly and justly, in contrast to the corrupt systems that characterize the modern age. The rise of oppressive, materialistic, and exploitative powers today reflects the influence of Dajjal, and Dhul-Qarnayn’s example offers a model for resisting such forces.

The Modern World as Dajjal’s Playground

Imran N. Hosein’s "Surah Al-Kahf and the Modern Age" emphasizes that the Dajjal is not merely an individual who will appear in the future but a process of deception that is already deeply embedded in modern civilization. The technological advancements, economic systems, political structures, and cultural norms that dominate today's world are seen as tools through which Dajjal exercises his influence.

Hosein identifies features such as the spread of materialism, the erosion of spiritual values, the dominance of usurious financial systems, and the unbridled pursuit of power and wealth as manifestations of Dajjal’s agenda. He warns that the modern age is characterized by illusions that distract people from the true purpose of life, much like the deceptions attributed to Dajjal.

Surah Al-Kahf as a Guide for Protection Against Dajjal

In light of these challenges, Hosein’s work underscores the importance of Surah Al-Kahf as a means of protection against Dajjal’s influence. The Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) recommended reciting the first ten and last ten verses of this chapter as a shield against Dajjal. Hosein emphasizes that beyond mere recitation, Muslims must internalize the lessons and wisdom found in the Surah to build resilience against the trials of the modern world.

The themes of faith, humility, gratitude, patience, and justice presented in Surah Al-Kahf serve as antidotes to the deceptions of Dajjal. By reflecting on the stories in this chapter, believers can develop a clearer understanding of the challenges they face and how to navigate them with wisdom and faith.

Conclusion

Imran N. Hosein's "Surah Al-Kahf and the Modern Age" provides a compelling interpretation of how the Quranic chapter is intricately connected to the concept of Dajjal. He presents Dajjal not just as a future figure but as a present reality influencing the ideologies, systems, and values of the modern world. By exploring the stories of Surah Al-Kahf, Hosein highlights the timeless guidance it offers for recognizing and resisting the forces of deception that threaten humanity's spiritual well-being.

In an age where materialism, arrogance, and denial of the divine have become pervasive, Hosein’s insights offer a pathway for believers to remain steadfast in their faith and to prepare themselves for the trials that lie ahead. Surah Al-Kahf stands as a beacon of light, providing protection and guidance in a world increasingly dominated by the deceptions of Dajjal.

Is 'Treacherous Alliance' by Trita Parsi about Secret Alliance between Iran and Israel even during Khomeini's era?

"Treacherous Alliance" by Trita Parsi: A Look at the Secret Relationship Between Iran and Israel, Even During Khomeini's Era

Introduction

"Treacherous Alliance: The Secret Dealings of Israel, Iran, and the United States" by Trita Parsi is a groundbreaking book that delves into the complex and often paradoxical relationship between Iran and Israel, including their covert interactions during the Khomeini era. This period is particularly fascinating because, despite the ideological divide between the Islamic Republic of Iran and the Jewish state, both countries found themselves cooperating behind the scenes. Parsi's book challenges the common perception that Iran and Israel have always been bitter enemies and exposes the nuanced, pragmatic, and sometimes contradictory nature of their relationship.

Iran-Israel Relations Before the Islamic Revolution

To understand the full scope of the relationship, it’s essential to start with the context of the pre-revolution era. Before the 1979 Islamic Revolution, Iran, under the Pahlavi monarchy led by Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, enjoyed a close and cooperative relationship with Israel. Both nations were aligned against Arab nationalism, particularly the threat posed by Egypt under Gamal Abdel Nasser, who sought to unite the Arab world against perceived imperialist and Zionist threats. This shared threat made Iran and Israel natural allies, and they collaborated on several fronts, including intelligence sharing, military cooperation, and economic ties.

Parsi meticulously details this pre-revolution collaboration, laying the groundwork for understanding why the two countries might have continued their secretive dealings even after the rise of the Islamic Republic, despite the stark ideological shift that occurred when Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini took power.

The Ideological Shift and the Emergence of a Secret Alliance

The 1979 Islamic Revolution drastically altered Iran’s political landscape. The new regime, led by Ayatollah Khomeini, openly declared Israel an enemy, branding it as the "Little Satan" (with the United States being the "Great Satan"). The anti-Israel rhetoric became a cornerstone of the Islamic Republic's ideology, and Iran formally cut off all diplomatic ties with Israel. Publicly, the two countries appeared to be fierce adversaries.

However, as Parsi reveals in "Treacherous Alliance," this enmity was far more complicated. Beneath the surface, geopolitical and strategic interests continued to bind Iran and Israel together in ways that were at odds with their public posturing. One of the most striking examples of this clandestine cooperation occurred during the early years of the Iran-Iraq War (1980–1988). Although the Islamic Republic of Iran officially denounced Israel, the two countries shared a common enemy: Iraq, led by Saddam Hussein.

Parsi explains how Israel, despite Khomeini’s anti-Zionist stance, decided to provide covert support to Iran during the war. Israel feared the rise of Saddam Hussein as a powerful and hostile actor in the region, and it viewed a weakened Iraq as being in its own strategic interest. Iran, on the other hand, needed weapons and military support to fend off Saddam’s aggression. This mutual interest led to secret arms deals, which became known as the "Iran-Contra Affair" or "Irangate" in the United States.

The Iran-Contra Affair and the Arms-for-Hostages Deal

One of the most significant revelations in "Treacherous Alliance" is the extent to which Israel acted as a middleman in the Iran-Contra affair, a scandal that rocked the Reagan administration in the 1980s. The essence of this covert operation was that the United States, despite its official policy of not negotiating with terrorists, sought to facilitate the sale of arms to Iran in exchange for the release of American hostages held by Iranian-backed Hezbollah in Lebanon. Israel played a pivotal role in these transactions by acting as an intermediary.

According to Parsi, Israel viewed this arrangement as a way to maintain some level of influence in Iran and to keep channels of communication open, even though the Islamic Republic had publicly denounced it. The arms sales included anti-tank missiles, ammunition, and spare parts for military equipment, demonstrating that Israel was willing to overlook ideological differences for strategic benefits.

What is particularly interesting is how Parsi delves into the decision-making processes on both sides. He shows that even within the ideologically driven regime of Ayatollah Khomeini, there were pragmatic elements that recognized the necessity of dealing with Israel when it served Iran's interests. This underscores one of Parsi’s central arguments: that national interests and realpolitik often take precedence over ideology, even in states that are ostensibly driven by rigid ideological principles.

The “Periphery Doctrine” and Israel’s Pragmatic Approach

Parsi explores Israel's “Periphery Doctrine,” a strategic concept that shaped its foreign policy in the region. The doctrine, developed in the 1950s by Israeli leaders like David Ben-Gurion, involved forming alliances with non-Arab states on the periphery of the Middle East, such as Iran, Turkey, and Ethiopia, to counterbalance hostile Arab neighbors. This doctrine continued to influence Israeli foreign policy even after Iran's Islamic Revolution, as Israel sought to prevent Iraq from emerging as the dominant power in the region.

By providing Iran with military assistance during the Iran-Iraq War, Israel hoped to keep both Iraq and Iran weakened, ensuring that neither would be capable of threatening Israel’s security. This pragmatic approach highlights how Israel, despite its democratic and ideological identity, was willing to engage with an avowedly hostile regime when it aligned with its strategic interests.

The Shift in the Post-War Era and the Rise of Hostility

While Parsi’s book demonstrates that there was significant cooperation between Iran and Israel during the 1980s, the relationship began to sour in the 1990s. After the Iran-Iraq War ended in 1988, Iran began to emerge as a regional power, and its revolutionary zeal intensified, particularly with regard to its support for anti-Israel groups like Hezbollah in Lebanon and Palestinian factions opposed to the peace process.

The collapse of the Soviet Union and the subsequent reordering of Middle Eastern alliances also contributed to the growing tensions. Iran no longer needed Israel’s support and began to pursue its regional ambitions more aggressively, positioning itself as the champion of the Palestinian cause and an opponent of Israel’s existence.

Parsi explains that this shift marked the beginning of a more overtly antagonistic phase in Iran-Israel relations, but he emphasizes that even during this period, elements of pragmatism occasionally emerged. For instance, Iran refrained from direct military confrontation with Israel and maintained some backchannel communications, particularly in relation to issues involving regional stability and shared threats.

Conclusions and the Significance of "Treacherous Alliance"

Trita Parsi’s "Treacherous Alliance" provides a nuanced and comprehensive account of the secret relationship between Iran and Israel, challenging the simplistic notion that these two countries have always been sworn enemies. Parsi demonstrates that, even during the era of Ayatollah Khomeini’s rule, geopolitical considerations often outweighed ideological rigidity, leading to instances of cooperation that might seem counterintuitive at first glance.

The book is not just a historical recounting but also a study of how national interests, power politics, and pragmatic considerations can drive states to form alliances that defy their public rhetoric. It underscores the complexity of Middle Eastern geopolitics, where alliances and enmities are rarely as clear-cut as they seem.

By shedding light on the secret dealings between Iran and Israel, "Treacherous Alliance" offers valuable insights into the nature of international relations, particularly in a region as volatile and unpredictable as the Middle East. It forces readers to reconsider the conventional narratives of enmity and alliance, revealing that even the most ideologically driven regimes can act pragmatically when their survival and strategic interests are at stake.

In summary, Trita Parsi's work serves as an essential resource for anyone seeking to understand the intricate and often paradoxical relationship between Iran and Israel, especially during the Khomeini era. It offers a reminder that in the world of international politics, things are rarely as they appear on the surface.

What is Radical Zionism?

Radical Zionism refers to a far-right ideological strand within the broader Zionist movement that advocates for extreme measures in pursuing Jewish sovereignty and security, often with little regard for the political, social, or human rights implications for Palestinians or other non-Jews in the region.

Key characteristics include:

Greater Israel: Radical Zionists often endorse the idea of a "Greater Israel," which includes not only the current State of Israel but also the West Bank, Gaza, and parts of neighboring territories. They see these areas as part of the biblical homeland of the Jewish people and reject any territorial concessions, even for the sake of peace.

Opposition to Palestinian Statehood: Radical Zionists are generally opposed to the creation of a Palestinian state. They often reject any negotiation with Palestinian leadership, arguing that giving up land would weaken Israel's security and identity as a Jewish state.

Settler Movement: Many Radical Zionists are associated with the Jewish settler movement in the West Bank, which seeks to expand Jewish presence in areas considered historically significant to Judaism. Some believe that Jewish law mandates the reclamation and settling of all these territories.

Militancy and Extremism: Some factions within Radical Zionism are willing to use violence or promote militaristic policies to achieve their goals. Radical Zionists often support the expansion of Israeli military operations, strict security measures, and aggressive responses to any perceived threat.

Religious and Nationalist Fusion: Radical Zionism is often intertwined with religious Jewish nationalism. Many adherents believe that Jewish sovereignty over all biblical lands is a divine mandate, elevating the political project of Zionism to a religious mission.

Radical Zionism differs from mainstream Zionism, which originally aimed for the establishment of a Jewish homeland through more pragmatic, political, and often secular means, with varying approaches to coexisting with Arabs and Palestinians.

What is Political Zionism?

Political Zionism is a movement that emerged in the late 19th century advocating for the establishment of a Jewish state in Palestine. The term is often associated with Theodor Herzl, who is considered one of the founding figures of the movement. Herzl and other early Zionists sought to address the widespread anti-Semitism in Europe by creating a sovereign Jewish homeland where Jews could exercise self-determination and live free from persecution.

Political Zionism is distinct from other forms of Zionism, such as cultural or religious Zionism, in its emphasis on the political and territorial aspects of Jewish statehood. It focuses on diplomatic and political efforts to establish and maintain a Jewish state, rather than purely cultural or religious goals. The movement played a significant role in the eventual establishment of the State of Israel in 1948.

Key elements of Political Zionism include the promotion of Jewish immigration to Palestine, the establishment of Jewish institutions and infrastructure, and the negotiation of international support for the Jewish state. The Balfour Declaration of 1917 and the subsequent League of Nations mandate were important milestones in this process, reflecting international recognition and support for the idea of a Jewish homeland in Palestine.

Who was Ayatollah Khomeini?

Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini (1902–1989) was an Iranian Shia cleric, revolutionary, and political leader who became the founder and first Supreme Leader of the Islamic Republic of Iran. He played a central role in the 1979 Iranian Revolution, which overthrew the Pahlavi monarchy, led by Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, and established an Islamic theocracy in Iran.

Key points about Khomeini:

Religious Scholar and Cleric: Khomeini was a Grand Ayatollah, one of the highest-ranking titles in Shia Islam. He spent years teaching Islamic philosophy, theology, and ethics.

Opposition to the Shah: Throughout the 1960s and 1970s, Khomeini became a vocal critic of the Shah's policies, especially his close ties to the West, secularization, and modernization efforts, which Khomeini saw as anti-Islamic. His opposition to the Shah made him a popular figure among those dissatisfied with the regime.

Exile: Khomeini was exiled from Iran in 1964 for his outspoken criticism. He spent years in Turkey, Iraq, and eventually France, continuing his anti-Shah activities. Despite his physical absence, he remained a powerful symbolic leader through his writings, recorded speeches, and declarations.

1979 Iranian Revolution: The Shah's regime collapsed in 1979 after months of protests, strikes, and civil unrest. Khomeini returned to Iran in February of that year, where he was welcomed by millions of supporters. Shortly after his return, the monarchy was abolished, and Iran was declared an Islamic Republic following a national referendum.

Islamic Republic of Iran: Khomeini established a theocratic system of government based on the concept of Velayat-e Faqih (Guardianship of the Islamic Jurist), where a religious leader holds ultimate political authority. He became the Supreme Leader, holding immense power over both the state and the armed forces.

Anti-Western and Anti-Israeli Sentiment: Khomeini's government adopted a strongly anti-Western and anti-Israeli stance, viewing Western influence as corrupting and imperialistic. His ideology inspired political Islam across the region and emphasized independence from foreign powers.

Iran-Iraq War: Under his leadership, Iran fought a brutal war with Iraq (1980–1988) after Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein invaded Iran. The war resulted in massive casualties and economic strain on both nations.

Legacy: Khomeini remains a deeply influential figure in Iran and among Islamic movements worldwide. While revered by many Iranians for leading the revolution, his legacy is also controversial due to the establishment of a strict theocracy and the repression of political opponents. His ideology continues to shape Iran’s domestic and foreign policies.

Khomeini passed away in 1989, and his successor, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, continues to hold the position of Supreme Leader.

What is Secular Zionism?

Secular Zionism is a branch of Zionism that emphasizes the establishment and support of a Jewish homeland, typically in the land of Israel, without necessarily basing this aspiration on religious beliefs. It is rooted more in cultural, historical, and national identity than in religious obligation.

Key Features of Secular Zionism:

National Identity: Secular Zionists view Judaism primarily as a national or ethnic identity rather than strictly a religious one. They focus on the cultural and historical aspects of Jewish identity, emphasizing the need for a Jewish state as a place of refuge and cultural revival.

Historical Justification: This movement often justifies the establishment of a Jewish state by pointing to the historical connection of the Jewish people to the land of Israel, rather than relying on religious texts or divine promises.

Social and Political Focus: Secular Zionism often aligns with socialist or labor-oriented ideologies. Many early Zionist leaders and settlers were secular and advocated for the establishment of a Jewish state through social, economic, and political means.

Separation of Religion and State: While supporting the creation of a Jewish homeland, secular Zionists typically advocate for the separation of religion and state. They support a Jewish national identity that is inclusive of all Jews, regardless of their level of religious observance.

Historical Context:

Secular Zionism emerged in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, largely in response to rising anti-Semitism in Europe and the desire among Jews to have a homeland where they could live freely and self-determinedly. Prominent figures associated with secular Zionism include Theodor Herzl, considered the father of modern political Zionism, and David Ben-Gurion, Israel's first Prime Minister.

This movement was crucial in the establishment of the State of Israel in 1948, as it provided a unifying national vision that could appeal to Jews from diverse backgrounds, including those who were not religious.

Was Theodore Herzl, the Founder of Jewish Zionism an Atheist?

Theodor Herzl, often regarded as the father of modern political Zionism, was not an atheist, but his relationship with religion was complex. Herzl was born into a secular Jewish family in Budapest, Hungary, and he was more culturally Jewish than religiously observant. While Herzl was deeply committed to the idea of a Jewish state, his Zionism was largely a political and nationalist movement rather than a religious one.

Herzl believed in the need for a Jewish homeland primarily as a solution to the persistent anti-Semitism Jews faced in Europe. His vision for the Jewish state was inclusive of both secular and religious Jews, and he did not see the future Jewish state as being strictly religious.

In summary, while Herzl was not a devoutly religious person, he was not an outright atheist either. His Zionism was driven more by cultural and political considerations than by religious faith.

'Treacherous Alliance' by Trita Parsi

"Treacherous Alliance: The Secret Dealings of Israel, Iran, and the United States" by Trita Parsi is a well-regarded book that delves into the complex and often secretive relationships between Israel, Iran, and the United States from the time of the Shah to the present. Parsi, an Iranian-American scholar, uses a wealth of interviews and documents to explore how these three nations have interacted, often in ways that defy public expectations.

The book focuses on the geopolitical strategies, the shifting alliances, and the covert operations that have shaped the Middle East. Parsi argues that the hostility between Israel and Iran is not rooted in ancient religious or ethnic enmity but in strategic considerations. He also sheds light on the role of the United States in this triangular relationship, particularly in the context of its foreign policy in the region.

Key themes in the book include:

Historical Context: Parsi traces the evolution of relations between Israel and Iran, starting from the time of the Shah, when Iran and Israel had a covert alliance, to the Islamic Revolution, which radically altered Iran's foreign policy.

Strategic Interests: The book argues that the enmity between Iran and Israel is largely strategic, driven by their respective regional ambitions and security concerns.

US Involvement: Parsi also examines the role of the United States, how it has alternated between supporting and opposing each nation, and how its policies have influenced the dynamics between Israel and Iran.

Secret Diplomacy: The book provides insights into the covert negotiations and back-channel communications that have occurred over the decades, often out of public view.

"Treacherous Alliance" is a valuable resource for anyone interested in understanding the complex and often contradictory relationships between these three countries. It challenges many conventional narratives and provides a nuanced analysis of Middle Eastern geopolitics.

What is Religious Zionism?

Religious Zionism is a movement within the broader Zionist ideology that combines Zionism, which advocates for the establishment and support of a Jewish state in the historical Land of Israel, with religious Jewish beliefs. It represents a synthesis of Jewish nationalism and religious observance, aiming to create a society in Israel that not only serves as a homeland for the Jewish people but also upholds and is governed by Jewish religious laws and traditions.

Key Aspects of Religious Zionism:

Theological Foundation: Religious Zionists believe that the establishment of the State of Israel is part of a divine plan and that the return of Jews to the Land of Israel fulfills biblical prophecies. They see the founding of Israel in 1948 as a step toward the ultimate redemption, which is expected to culminate in the coming of the Messiah.

Support for the State of Israel: While traditional Orthodox Jews were historically skeptical or opposed to Zionism, viewing it as a secular movement, Religious Zionists actively support the State of Israel. They see the state not just as a political entity but as a spiritual revival of the Jewish nation.

Settlements: Religious Zionism is closely associated with the movement to establish and expand Jewish settlements in the West Bank, which they refer to by its biblical names, Judea and Samaria. They believe that Jews have a religious duty to settle the entire Land of Israel, as promised to the Jewish people in the Torah.

Political Influence: Religious Zionists are represented in Israeli politics, most prominently through parties like the Religious Zionist Party. They advocate for policies that reflect their beliefs, including the promotion of Jewish education, support for settlement expansion, and the integration of Jewish law into the Israeli legal system.

Cultural and Religious Life: The movement encourages a way of life that integrates religious observance with modernity. This includes participation in the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF), involvement in the economy and public life, and the establishment of religious institutions, such as yeshivas, that emphasize Zionist ideals.

Historical Background:

Religious Zionism emerged in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, with Rabbi Abraham Isaac Kook being one of its most influential figures. Rabbi Kook's teachings emphasized that the secular pioneers of Zionism were unwittingly fulfilling a divine mission, and he sought to bridge the gap between secular Zionists and religious Jews.

Overall, Religious Zionism plays a significant role in Israeli society, influencing both the political landscape and the ongoing debate about the future of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

Was Zionism founded by Ashkenazic Jews?

Yes, Zionism was primarily founded and driven by Ashkenazic Jews. The Zionist movement emerged in the late 19th century in Europe, where the majority of Jews were Ashkenazic, primarily from Central and Eastern Europe. Theodor Herzl, often considered the father of modern political Zionism, was an Ashkenazic Jew from Austria-Hungary. The movement aimed to establish a Jewish homeland in Palestine, which culminated in the founding of the State of Israel in 1948. While Sephardic and Mizrahi Jews also played roles in the Zionist movement, the early leadership and ideological foundations were predominantly Ashkenazic.

The Alliance Recurs during The Modern Times between Masonic America and Israel with Shiite Iran

www.darius-lucas-nehemiah.blogspot.com/2016/12/khomeini-and-us-secret-relationships.html

www.advanced-ama-agenda.blogspot.com/2020/04/how-united-states-put-khomeini-in-power.html

www.hirhome.com/iraniraq/gulfwar.htm

www.english.alarabiya.net/en/views/news/middle-east/2016/06/08/Iran-s-engagement-with-Israel-and-the-Great-Satan-

www.advanced-ama-agenda.blogspot.com/2019/12/iran-and-israel-secret-relationships.html

The Secret Alliance between America, Iran and Israel during The Era of Khomeini

www.en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran%E2%80%93Israel_relations

www.wrmea.org/1988-april/khomeini-s-iran-israel-s-ally.html

www.arabnews.com/news/460157

www.thedailybeast.com/7-things-you-might-not-know-about-iranian-views-of-israel

www.iranicaonline.org/articles/israel-i-relations-with-iran

www.dw.com/en/iran-und-israel-the-best-of-enemies/a-17437981

www.haaretz.com/middle-east-news/iran/MAGAZINE-how-israel-and-iran-went-from-allies-to-enemies-1.6049884

https://www.english.alarabiya.net/en/views/news/middle-east/2016/06/08/Iran-s-engagement-with-Israel-and-the-Great-Satan-

'Surah Al-Kahf and The Modern Age' written by Imran Hosein

"Surah Al-Kahf and the Modern Age" by Imran N. Hosein is a book that explores the themes and lessons of Surah Al-Kahf (Chapter 18 of the Qur'an) in the context of contemporary issues and challenges. Imran Hosein, an Islamic scholar known for his interpretations of Islamic eschatology, offers a detailed analysis of the surah, linking its messages to the modern age.

Key Themes and Topics in the Book:

Dajjal (The Antichrist): Hosein delves into the prophecies related to Dajjal, interpreting the signs and events mentioned in the hadith (sayings of the Prophet Muhammad) and linking them to current global events.

The Three Major Stories in Surah Al-Kahf:

The People of the Cave: Discusses the story of the youths who sought refuge in a cave to escape religious persecution, drawing parallels to modern-day challenges of maintaining faith in a secular world.

The Story of the Two Gardens: Analyzes the story of a rich man who is ungrateful and arrogant, contrasting it with a poorer but humble man. Hosein explores themes of materialism and the true essence of wealth.

The Journey of Moses and Khidr: Interprets the mysterious journey of Moses with the wise figure Khidr, focusing on the lessons of patience, knowledge, and the unseen wisdom of God.

The Story of Dhul-Qarnayn: Examines the account of Dhul-Qarnayn, a powerful and just ruler who builds a barrier to protect people from the destructive tribes of Gog and Magog, relating it to contemporary political and social issues.

Materialism and Modernity: Hosein critiques the modern materialistic worldview, arguing that it leads to spiritual and moral decline. He emphasizes the importance of spiritual awakening and returning to Islamic principles.

Guidance for Muslims: The book provides practical advice for Muslims on how to navigate the complexities of the modern world while staying true to their faith.

Imran N. Hosein's Perspective:

Imran Hosein is known for his unique interpretations and his focus on Islamic eschatology. He often emphasizes the importance of understanding the signs of the end times and preparing for them. His views can sometimes be controversial, but they provide a thought-provoking perspective on the application of Islamic teachings to contemporary issues.

Conclusion:

"Surah Al-Kahf and the Modern Age" is a thought-provoking book that offers a detailed analysis of Surah Al-Kahf and its relevance to today's world. It encourages readers to reflect on the deeper meanings of the Qur'an and to apply its teachings to navigate the challenges of the modern age.

Who is Muqtada Al-Sadr?

Muqtada al-Sadr is an influential Iraqi Shia cleric, politician, and militia leader. He is the leader of the Sadrist Movement, which includes both a political wing and a militia called the Mahdi Army (now rebranded as Saraya al-Salam). Al-Sadr rose to prominence after the 2003 invasion of Iraq and has been a significant figure in Iraqi politics and Shia Muslim communities.

Key Points about Muqtada al-Sadr:

Family Background: He is the son of the late Grand Ayatollah Mohammad Mohammad Sadeq al-Sadr, a revered Shia cleric who was assassinated in 1999, presumably by the regime of Saddam Hussein. His family has a long history of religious leadership in Iraq.

Mahdi Army: In 2003, after the fall of Saddam Hussein, al-Sadr founded the Mahdi Army, which fought against coalition forces and rival Shia militias. The Mahdi Army was involved in several significant battles and uprisings, particularly in Najaf and Baghdad's Sadr City.

Political Influence: Al-Sadr's movement has consistently been a significant force in Iraqi politics. He has positioned himself as a nationalist and a critic of both U.S. influence in Iraq and Iranian interference. His political bloc, known as the Sairoon Alliance, has won substantial representation in Iraqi parliamentary elections.

Shifts in Strategy: Over the years, al-Sadr's strategy has shifted from militancy to political participation and advocacy for reforms. He has called for anti-corruption measures, social justice, and better public services.

Religious and Social Role: Beyond politics, al-Sadr is a religious leader with considerable influence over a large segment of Iraq's Shia population. He has also engaged in interfaith dialogues and has taken positions on various social issues in Iraq.

Muqtada al-Sadr remains a complex and often controversial figure, balancing his roles as a cleric, militia leader, and politician. His actions and decisions continue to significantly impact Iraq's political landscape.

Free E-books on Shiism and The Twelth Imam

Shiism, an offshoot of Islam and probably the largest deviant sect within Pan-Islamic world.

It is in essence a religion different than Islam; arguably an amalgamation of Judaism, Christianity, Zoroastrianism and Babylonian paganism but given outward Islamic form.

Unfortunately, the Antichrist (the Islamic 'Al-Masih Ad-Dajjal'), based on authentic narrations of the Prophet of Islam, may appear within this religion.

Ahmad Nor believes religion of the Antichrist will be akin to Bahaism, itself an offshoot of Shiism.

Visitors are welcome to research and access free books on Shiism here:

World Islamic Network

Ya Mahdi

Mousawi Islamic Library

AHLUL-BAYT ISLAMIC LIBRARY

Emergence of the Antichrist and the New World Order

The UNIFOND Organization, part of The UNU Group is preparing an important piece of work relating to the future World events, in particular the Antichrist (Islamic 'Al-Masih Ad-Dajjal'), in the Malay Language called Menanti Imam Ke-12: Peranan Revolusi Iran Di Belakang Tabir Dalam Mempersiapkan Kedatangan Dajjal. It will be translated into Arabic and English soon to reach Arab and Western worlds.

The work is not meant to incite hatred between religionists but to raise their awareness, with the hope of building a better world.

Hopefully it will expose the hidden hands behind the current World situations that the International public probably had never even known of, discussing:

The Judaic origins of Shiism. Shiism and Islam are two different religions. Penetration of the Kharijites into Shiism after demise of the Caliph Ali. They were extreme Muslims who had left Islam and war was declared by Ali against them following advice of the Prophet Muhammad who insisted on killing them for they will be followers of The Antichrist. Prophecy by the Prophet that the Antichrist will appear among the Kharijites. The book traces the religious lineage of present Shiites back to their Kharijite forefathers.

Hizbullah's involvement in the killing of innocent civilians of Shabra Shatila. What are they up to now in Lebanon? Are they are trying to ignite the Middle East into potential World War Three and more dangerously attempting to win the attention of the Islamic World?

The secret US-Iran relationships. Enemies in public but friends in private. 'Irangate' scandal touched. Khomeini's path to power eased by the White House. Khomeini's strange beliefs and diversion from true Islamic teachings of the Prophet Muhammad. The mention by the Prophet Muhammad of the appearance of the Antichrist in Isfahan, Iran. Why in Iran, an Islamic fundamentalist state? Not in America?

Many Shiite scholars mentioned that The Twelth Imam, will also be the Messiah of the Jews and the Christians. Will it be the same figure who will appear as The Twelth Imam of the Shiites, Moshiach of the Jews and Christ of the Christians? Will he be the Antichrist?

The prophecy of the Prophet Muhammad in authentic narrations that the Antichrist will appear within the Muslim world (between Syria and Iraq), and not in the West as imagined by many Muslims. Several Biblical scholars argued based on their research that The Beast will come from the Eastern leg of The Roman Empire (now the vast area encompassing Syria, Iraq and Iran). The 3 countries are at present under the tight grip of the Shiite Governments.

Situation in Iraq. Countless of Muslims are being slaughtered daily by Shiites, assisted by the Americans.

Nostradamus prophesied that the Antichrist will destroy present Christianity and distort beliefs of Islam. Also mention by him of the taking over of Iran by placing a human decoy (Ahmadinajad?) into power and subsequently his future assasination before the Antichrist (Shiite Hidden Imam?) appears on the scene.

The Hojjatieh Society, a secret society now controlling President Ahmadinajad and all levels of the Iranian Government, having philosophy very much similar to Freemasonry, one motto being 'creation of order before chaos to hasten the arrival of the Hidden Imam'.

The Author's views regarding future World events in chronological order:

Appearance of the true Imam Mahdi appearing from Madinah, leading the World into Global peace and prosperity and paving the way for the second coming of Christ.

World War 3 will erupt in the Middle East, wiping out both Middle Eastern Zionist and Islamic Worlds.

Emergence of Iran as the new Superpower in the Middle East.

Appearance of The Antichrist on the global scene after the War as Saviour of Humanity, appearing simultaneously as 'The Twelth Imam' of the Shiites, 'Moshiach' of the Zionists, 'Christ' of the Christians, 'Maitreya' of the Buddhists and Saviour awaited by other religions. Possibility of the present Ecumenical Movement being precursor to the future New World Messianic Religion of the Antichrist.

The possibility of Greater Israel State being also Greater Shiite State.

If prophecies of Nostradamus can be relied, the taking over of Iran by the Antichrist, to be followed by unity of the entire Islamic Nation under him (The Prophet mentioned that majority of his followers will be deceived by 'Al-Masih Ad-Dajjal'), and eventually the merger of the entire Islamic nation with atheistic Russia and China to become the next Superpower. America's influence will be reduced greatly.

Finally, The Antichrist will be killed at the hands of Jesus Christ who will put an end to tyranny and oppression on the Globe. The Golden Age (The Kingdom of God) will be established with the second coming of Jesus, after destruction of the Antichrist and subsequently Gog Magog ( research on Gog Magog will be presented in a separate book).

Humanity will embrace Islam in large numbers. Christ will take humanity to the understanding of Islam as originally brought by the Prophet Muhammad and his companions; Islam that is pure from polytheism and innovations and Islam that promotes advancement in spirituality as well as economy, business, science and technology.

The Antichrist will appear among Shiites, not Muslims

Relating to my personal research on the Biblical Antichrist, I conclude beyond reasonable doubt that the Antichrist as prophesied in the Bible and by the Prophet, Muhammad, is both Moshiach of the Jews and The Twelth Imam of the Shiites.

Shiism of Khomeini diverges considerably in creed from Islam of the Prophet, Muhammad, and it is heartbreaking to see so-called Christian scholars slandering Islam based on perversions of Shiite Ayatollahs.

The Antichrist will initially emerge in Iran as The New Cyrus and The Twelth Imam and will then enter Israel to be crowned as Moshiach of the Zionists and finally Christ of The Holy See!

The Antichrist is our future universal tribulation, not just of the Muslims or Jews or Christians!

Iran's Shocking 50 Year Plot to Rule the Middle East and Beyond, by Iranian Sunni Group

The Prophet, Muhammad prophesied that The Antichrist will appear in Iran accompanied by 70,000 Jews, bearing that in mind and the treacherous history of Shiites throughout centuries, this secret letter is quite a shocking revelation.

Will the Antichrist appear as The Twelth Imam and usurp the so-called Iranian Islamic Revolution?

Top Secret Letter From Cultural Revolutionary Council to Iranian Mayors:

If we are not able to export our revolution to neighboring Islamic countries, then undoubtedly the culture of these countries, mixed with Western culture, will attack and conquer us. Thanks to God and after centuries of brave sacrifice of the nation of the 12 imams in Iran, we are now – according to the revered Shiite leaders’ guidance – carrying a heavy and dangerous responsibility: that is, the exportation of revolution. Based on that, we have to admit that our government, besides its mission in keeping the sovereignty of this country and the people’s rights, is an ideological government. We must make the exportation of the revolution one of our top priorities. But because of the international status quo and international laws – as generally agreed upon – we cannot export the revolution without facing grave and disastrous consequences.

After three sessions with the semi-consensus of the attendees and committee members, we have implemented a five-year plan, including five stages, each stage lasting 10 years, by which to export our Islamic revolution to neighboring countries with the initial aim of unifying Islam. This is because the danger we are facing from the Wahhabi rulers and those of Sunni descent is much larger than the danger posed by the East and West because they – the Wahhabis and Sunnis – resist our movement and are the fundamental enemies of the clergy’s guardianship (Wilayat al-Faqih) and the impeccable imams, to the extent that they consider embracing the Shiite sect as a religious sect and as a constitution for the country as a matter contrary to custom and Syariah.

Therefore they are dividing Islam into two opposing branches. Accordingly, we must increase our influence over the Sunni territories inside Iran, and especially in the border towns, and increase the number of mosques and Husseinite and ceremonies of creed more than before. We must provide the atmosphere in the cities that are inhabited by 90-100% Sunnis until scores of Shiites are deported from cities and villages of the interior of the country to live and work in these border towns forever. The nation and governmental circles must provide direct protection to these settlers in order to take over the management of cities and social and cultural centers that have previously been controlled by Sunni citizens.The plan we drew up to export the revolution – in order to avert any reaction from world superpowers – will utilize money that will not be spent without benefit.

The way to establish the pillars of the state: We know that establishing the pillars of each state and sustaining a nation is based on three foundations: First: the power possessed by the governing authority; Second: the learning and knowledge of the scholars and researchers; Third: the economy, which is concentrated in the hands of business leaders. If we can shake the government by inciting conflict between rulers and scholars and disperse capital in these countries and attract capital from their country to ours, we would undoubtedly be very successful because we would cause them to lose these three pillars. Regarding the rest of the people, who form 70-80% of the population of each country, they are just followers of power and influence and they are indulged in their way of life earning their livings and providing themselves with shelter. This is why they defend those in power.

In order to get to the roof of a house one must begin by stepping on the first rung of the ladder. Our Sunni and Wahhabi neighbors are Turkey, Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan and some of the Emirates to the south at the entrance of the Persian Gulf that appear to be united on the surface, but the facts are different. For this exact region has a huge impact on the past and the present as it is considered the throat of the earth due to the oil in the region. There is no place in the world as delicate as this region, and their rulers, because of the sale of this oil, have the potential for a better life. The populations of these regions are divided into three sects:1) The Bedouin who have been there for hundreds of years.2) Those who have immigrated from islands and ports which are considered part of our land today. Their immigration began in the era of Isamal al Safawi and continued through the eras of Nader Shah and Karim Khan Zind and the rulers of the Gajar and Bahlawi families, and there was some dispersed immigration at the beginning of the Islamic Revolution.3) Those from other Arab countries and cities of Iran’s interior. Trade, and the importing and exporting of goods, as well as construction of buildings is generally controlled by non-citizens; people living in the interior make their living by renting buildings and buying and selling land, while the relatives of those with influence live on salaries earned from the selling of oil. Most of the citizens of those countries are indulging in a socially and culturally corrupt lifestyle and other acts that are openly contrary to Islam. Many of these people are concerned only with purchasing apartments and shares in factories, depositing the capital in Europe and the United States, and especially in Japan, the United Kingdom, Sweden and Switzerland in fear of the future devastation of their countries. The control of these countries means the control of the world.

To implement the prepared 50-year plan we must, at the outset, foster our relations with our neighboring countries. There must be mutual respect, strong relations, and friendship between us to the degree that our relations will improve even after the war with Iraq and Saddam Hussein’s downfall: the fall of 1000 friends is a much easier burden to bear than the fall of one of our enemies. With good cultural, political and economic relations between us, many Iranians will immigrate to those countries and through them we can send agents who are apparently immigrants but who, in reality, are working for our regime. Their jobs will be determined as we enlist them into service by sending them abroad.

The influence of our sect, which is enjoyed to some extent in thses countries and their circles, was not a plan for just one or two days. Do not think that 50 years is a long time. Our revolution needes a plan that lasts 20 years, and our sect must enjoy a certain amount of influence in many countries and circles. At that time we did not have any employees or ministers or deputies or rulers, even the Wahhabi, Shafii, Hanafi, Maliki, Hanbali groups were considering us as apostates, and some of the followers of these sects killed the Shiites repeatedly. It is true that we did not exist at that time, but our grandfathers did, and our lives today are the fruit of their thoughts, opinions and efforts. Maybe we will not be here in the future, but our revolution and sect will remain. That is enough to be committed to this creed to sacrifice life, bread, and what we hold dear; but it is also important to have a well-studied program. We are committed to making plans not for 50 years, but for 500. We are the inheritors of millions of martyrs who have been killed by the Islamist devils (Sunnis). Their blood flows through history since the time of the death of the Prophet. The blood that has been spilled did not dry, and it will not dry until all Muslims believe in Ali and the Prophet’s family and admit the mistakes of the grandfathers and that Shiism is an ingrained inheritance of Islam.

Important stages along our way: In the first stage, we do not have a problem spreading our creed in Afghanistan, Pakistan, Turkey, Iraq and Bahrain. We will make the 10-year plan the first plan in those five countries. That is why it is the responsibility of our immigrant – who are really agents – to carry out the three responsibilities they are charged with :1) To buy land, houses, and apartments, find jobs and provide the necessities to the sons of our creed and live in these homes, and to increase their numbers. 2) To form relations and friendships with business leaders, factory managers, etc., and especially with businessmen, commercial leaders, and famous people and others who enjoy influence in government circles. 3) In these countries there are scattered villages that are still under construction. There are plans to build scores of villages and small towns where none exist.

Agents arriving in the form of immigrants to these countries must buy as many houses in these villages as possible and then sell them at a reasonable price to those who have sold their properties in the city centers. In this way control will be removed from those in densely populated towns and cities. In the second stage, we must spur the people (Shiites) to respect and obey the laws and those who enforce them, as well as government employees; they must obtain official license for their creed and sectarian sermons, building mosques and Husseinite, licenses that will be regarded in the future as official documents. To start businesses and become self-employed they must think of places with a highly dense population to spread their businesses in targeted locations. The person must, in these two stages, seek the nationality of the country he is living in by taking advantage of friends and giving valuable presents; furthermore, they must encourage the youth to work in government sectors and enlist in the military.

In the second half of the 10-year plan we must secretly and indirectly agitate the Sunnis and the Wahhabi scholars against social corruption and those acts in opposition to Islam that prevail in these countries by distributing critical pamphlets from other countries in the name of the religious authorities. Undoubtedly, this will cause the agitation of scores of people in these countries. In the end those religious leaders will be arrested or they will say that what has been written in their names are lies. These pious people will defend those pamphlets rigorously and suspicious acts will take place leading to an edict either to seize their authority or replace them. These acts will result in mistrust between the rulers and the pious in the country; therefore they will not be able to spread religion and build mosques and other religious buildings. The leaders will consider religious sermons rhetoric and celebrations of creed as acts opposed to their regimes. Furthermore, it will increase the grudges and alienations between religious scholars and rulers.

Even Sunnis and Wahhabis will lose the protection of their interior centers, and they will not have external protection at all. In the third stage, when our agents have established good relations with the business leaders, the military and executive powers and are doing their jobs quietly and with good manners and not interfering in religious actions, the result will be that their rulers will be reassured by these people more than previously. When disagreement arises between religious leaders and rulers, our famous scholars from this country will at that moment disclose their loyalty and defend the members of their countries, especially during the sermons of the creed and presents Shiism as a creed that does not pose a threat to religion. If they can declare that to the people through the media they should not hesitate to attract the attention of the rulers and get their approval so that they will give them good jobs without fear at this stage. Because of this transformation that will take place in our ports and islands and in other cities in the country, and with the funds we will invest, we will implement plans to strike a blow to the economy of neighboring countries. Undoubtedly the business leaders, for the sake of gaining safe profits and economic stability, will send all their funds to our country, and when we make others free in their businesses and the banking funds are in our country, the result will be that their countries will welcome our citizens and give them economic facilities by which to invest.

When we reach the fourth stage, everything will be ready. We have before us countries whose scholars and rulers have disagreements, and whose merchants are about to become bankrupt and are leaving their countries. The people are disturbed and ready to sell their properties at half price in order to be able to leave the country for safer places. In the middle of this chaos, our agents and immigrants will be considered the only protectors of rule and authority. All of our agents by being alert enough will take the most important jobs in the civil, military and government sectors, shrinking the gaps between them and government established rulers. From such a location we are able to easily point to the loyalists in government as traitors. All of this will result in their downfall and eliminating them to be replaced with our agents. This job has two positive results:1) our agents will gain the trust of the rulers to an extent greater than previously; and2) the discontent of the Sunnis towards the ruler will increase due to an increase in the Shiite in government circles. Because of this, Sunnis will carry out more acts of resistance, and during this phase our agents must stand by the rulers and call for calm and reconciliation.

At the same time, the agents will buy the houses and properties of those about to flee. At the fifth stage of the plan, the final ten years of the 50 years, the atmosphere will be ready for revolution, because we will have achieved the three elements of security, calm and comfort. The authority will look like a ship amid a typhoon, about to sink. At that time it will accept any suggestions for survival. In this period we will suggest, through famous people, the formation of a popular assembly to calm the situation and aid the rulers in monitoring these circles, as well as keeping discipline in the country.

Undoubtedly they will accept this suggestion and our candidates will win the majority of the seats. This will result in the flight of merchants and scholars, and even the loyal servants; thus we can export our Islamic Revolution to many countries without waging wars or shedding blood. If the plan does not bear fruit and give us power in the last ten years, we could create a popular revolution and strip power from their rulers. Even if apparently our elements – Shiites – are citizens and inhabitants of this country, nevertheless at that time we will be able to say that we fulfilled our responsibility before God and our creed. It is not our target to put one person in control of power. Our target is merely to export the revolution, and by then we can raise the banner of this Godly religion. We will go forward to the world of infidels with more strength and grace the world with the light of Islam and Shiism until the coming of Al-Mahdi Al-Mawud.

Book 9 Summary > The Antichrist Triangle: Israel's Alliance With America And Iran In Producing The Antichrist

Online:
The Antichrist Triangle

Medium:
English

Future Publisher:
AS Noordeen

The work is intended to exhibit the growing power of Israel in the Middle East as an open ally of the United States and a secret ally of Iran, mistakenly considered an arch enemy of the Zionist state.

The author argues from the prophecies of the Prophet Muhammad, the Old and New Testaments as well as the famed prophet-physician Nostradamus, that the Antichrist will be brought forward to appear as a global world leader by essentially the joint efforts of the 3 strongest powers of the Middle East today ie the United States, Iran and Israel; the three will be made to represent the Antichrist from the Christian, Islamic and Jewish worlds respectively.

The author will touch among others:

History of Israel, Iran and the United States. What occult organization founded America and Israel? And what has been the society's long term goal?

Background of Illuminati and its alliance with the Antichrist. On the Rothschilds, the Warburgs and other powerful 'Jewish' banking dynasties

Establishments of the United States, Britain, China, former USSR and the European Union by the Cabal Illuminati. They pave the way for the Antichrist

Quest for the mysterious Gog and Magog. Where are they in today's global scenes?

The worldwide control exercised by Illuminati over vast majority, if not all of today's modern governments, the United Nations, IMF and the World Bank as well as our education, financial and political systems

Illuminati has been behind International capitalism and communism, Zionism, Nazism, Darwinism, feminism and many other destructive ideologies facing the Globe

What does Christianity say about the Antichrist?

Christianity has various interpretations and teachings about the Antichrist, drawing primarily from the New Testament. The concept is complex and has evolved over time. Here's an overview of key elements:

Biblical References

New Testament

1 John 2:18-22; 4:3 and 2 John 1:7: The term "antichrist" appears explicitly in these epistles of John. These passages suggest that many antichrists have already appeared and define an antichrist as anyone who denies that Jesus is the Christ.

2 Thessalonians 2:3-12: This passage speaks of the "man of lawlessness" or "son of perdition" who opposes God and exalts himself. He will deceive people through false signs and wonders.

Revelation 13: Although the term "antichrist" is not used, Revelation describes a beast rising from the sea, often identified with the Antichrist. This beast receives power from the dragon (interpreted as Satan) and deceives the world.

Characteristics of the Antichrist

Deceiver: The Antichrist is portrayed as a deceiver who denies fundamental truths about Jesus Christ and leads many astray.

Opposer of God: He exalts himself above God and opposes all that is worshiped.

Performer of Miracles: He performs counterfeit miracles, signs, and wonders to deceive people.

Personification of Evil: The Antichrist is often seen as a figure embodying ultimate evil, working in direct opposition to Christ and His teachings.

Interpretations and Views

Historical/Catholic View: Historically, the Roman Catholic Church has seen the Antichrist as a future figure who will appear at the end of time. Some early church fathers, like Augustine, speculated about a specific person or era.

Protestant View: During the Reformation, many Protestant reformers identified the papacy with the Antichrist, arguing that it fulfilled the biblical descriptions of deceiving and opposing Christ.

Futurist View: Many evangelical Christians today hold a futurist perspective, believing the Antichrist is a future world leader who will arise during the end times, leading a period of great tribulation before the Second Coming of Christ.

Preterist View: Some interpret the Antichrist as a symbol of the Roman emperors or other figures from the early centuries of Christianity, believing these prophecies were fulfilled in the past.

Symbolic/Idealist View: Others see the Antichrist as a symbol of the ongoing struggle between good and evil, rather than a specific individual.

Role in Eschatology

The Antichrist plays a crucial role in Christian eschatology (the study of the end times). His appearance is seen as a sign of the approaching final judgment and the return of Jesus Christ. Various interpretations include:

Tribulation: A period of severe persecution and suffering associated with the Antichrist's rule.

Second Coming of Christ: The return of Jesus Christ to defeat the Antichrist and establish His eternal kingdom.

Final Judgment: The Antichrist's ultimate defeat and the judgment of all souls.

Summary

The Antichrist in Christianity is a multifaceted figure rooted in New Testament teachings, representing the epitome of opposition to Christ. Interpretations vary, with some viewing him as a future individual, others as a historical figure or symbol of evil, and still others as an embodiment of ongoing spiritual conflict. This diversity reflects broader theological differences within Christianity regarding the nature and timing of the end times.

The Antichrist according to Islam

In Islamic eschatology, the figure analogous to the Antichrist is known as the "Dajjal" (الدجّال). Here are the key aspects regarding the Dajjal according to Islamic teachings:

Name and Description: The term "Dajjal" comes from Arabic and can be translated as "the deceiver" or "the impostor." He is often referred to as "Al-Masih ad-Dajjal," meaning "the false Messiah."

Appearance and Characteristics:

The Dajjal is described as a one-eyed man, with his other eye being blind or defective. Some narrations mention that he will have the word "kafir" (unbeliever) written on his forehead, which true believers will be able to read.

He is said to be powerfully built, with a reddish complexion and curly hair.

Role and Mission:

The Dajjal's primary role is to mislead people and spread corruption on earth. He will claim to be a divine figure, performing miraculous deeds to deceive people into following him.

He will travel the world quickly, spreading his influence and testing the faith of believers. His period of influence is described as forty days, with the first day being as long as a year, the second day as long as a month, the third day as long as a week, and the remaining days as normal days.

Signs and Miracles:

The Dajjal will perform several supernatural feats, such as bringing rain to dry lands, reviving the dead, and making barren lands fertile. These miracles will be tests for the believers, distinguishing the faithful from the deceived.

Protection Against the Dajjal:

Muslims are encouraged to seek protection from the Dajjal by reciting specific supplications, such as the opening verses of Surah Al-Kahf (the 18th chapter of the Quran).

Another recommended practice is seeking refuge in Medina and Mecca, as it is believed that the Dajjal will be unable to enter these holy cities.

Defeat and End:

The ultimate defeat of the Dajjal will come with the return of Prophet Isa (Jesus), who is a significant figure in Islamic eschatology. Isa will descend from the heavens, confront the Dajjal, and kill him, thus bringing an end to his reign of terror.

These descriptions and beliefs about the Dajjal are derived from various Hadiths (sayings and traditions of the Prophet Muhammad) and form an essential part of Islamic teachings on the end times.