Were Ashab al-Kahf (The Seven Sleepers of the Cave) Monotheists?

The story of Ashab al-Kahf, or the Companions of the Cave, is one of the most famous narratives in the Qur'an and broader Abrahamic tradition. Found in Surah al-Kahf (18:9–26), the story speaks of a group of young men who fled persecution and miraculously slept in a cave for centuries. Central to this account is the question of their religious belief: Were they monotheists in the strict sense of tawḥīd, the Islamic concept of God's absolute oneness?

Summary of the Qur'anic Account

The Qur'an recounts that a group of youths withdrew from their people and sought refuge in a cave, praying:

"Our Lord! Grant us mercy from Yourself and guide us rightly through our ordeal."
(Surah al-Kahf 18:10)

They fled because they lived in a society engaged in shirk (polytheism or idolatry), and they refused to worship other than Allah. In response to their faith and steadfastness, Allah caused them to sleep in the cave for 309 lunar years. When they awoke, they were unaware of how long they had slept and attempted to cautiously re-engage with the outside world — only to discover that the society had transformed, and monotheism had prevailed.

The Qur'an commends their courage and their belief in the Oneness of Allah, using their story as a parable of youth, piety, and divine protection.

---

The Core Question: Were They Monotheists?

1. Qur'anic Evidence for Monotheism

The Qur’an explicitly supports the claim that the Ashab al-Kahf were firm monotheists:

"They were youths who believed in their Lord, so We increased them in guidance."
(Surah al-Kahf 18:13)

This verse makes several key points:

• They believed in Allah, rejecting the prevailing idolatry of their time.

• Their faith was so sincere that Allah increased them in guidance, suggesting that their understanding was not incomplete or corrupted.

Another critical verse is when the youths declare:

“Our Lord is the Lord of the heavens and the earth. We will never invoke any deity besides Him. Otherwise, we would certainly be saying something outrageous.”
(18:14)

This is a clear and forceful rejection of polytheism. It affirms tawḥīd, recognizing Allah as the sole deity, creator, and sustainer — the very definition of monotheism in Islamic theology.

2. Historical Context: Christianity in the Roman Empire

The Qur'anic story of Ashab al-Kahf closely parallels Christian legends of the “Seven Sleepers of Ephesus,” a story popular in late antiquity. In that Christian version, a group of young men hid in a cave to escape persecution under a Roman emperor (often identified as Decius, 3rd century CE), and woke up during the time of a Christian ruler.

In the Christian version, the youths were followers of Christ, and the story was seen as proof of the resurrection. Many historians argue that the Qur'an adopts this story but reorients its theological significance — highlighting their monotheism, rather than any particular sectarian affiliation.

So were they Christians? Possibly, yes — in a historical sense. But the Qur'an does not call them Nasara (Christians), nor does it endorse the Trinitarian doctrines that had by then emerged. Instead, it emphasizes their pure belief in one God, untainted by associations of divinity with Jesus or saints.

From this perspective, the Ashab al-Kahf might have been proto-monotheists or Hanifs — sincere believers in God who rejected idolatry and man-made doctrines, much like the Prophet Ibrahim (Abraham), or like the true followers of Isa (Jesus) before the development of Trinitarian theology.

---

3. Islamic Theological Position

According to classical Islamic scholars and commentators (mufassirun), the Ashab al-Kahf were true monotheists (muwahhidun), and their story serves as an example of steadfastness in tawḥīd in the face of tyranny.

Tafsir of Ibn Kathir

In his Tafsir al-Qur'an al-'Azim, Ibn Kathir emphasizes that these youths were followers of the religion of tawḥīd, in a society ruled by a tyrant who demanded the worship of false gods. They stood against this system and made du'a to Allah alone, which is the defining trait of a monotheist.

Ibn Kathir also relates the story back to earlier Christians who rejected idolatrous practices and remained faithful to God's Oneness — implying that the Ashab al-Kahf may have lived during a time of Christian persecution, but their faith was uncorrupted.

Al-Qurtubi’s Commentary

Imam al-Qurtubi, in his tafsir, also interprets the Ashab al-Kahf as monotheists in line with Islamic beliefs. He writes that they followed the religion of Tawḥīd, and Allah preserved them as a sign of His power. For al-Qurtubi, the details of their names, number, and dog are secondary — the main lesson is their belief in Allah alone.

---

4. Lessons from Their Monotheism

The Qur’anic narrative uses the Ashab al-Kahf to highlight essential principles of monotheistic belief:

a) Rejection of Shirk

Their statement — “We will never invoke any deity besides Him” — is an explicit rejection of all forms of idolatry, which is at the heart of tawḥīd.

b) Divine Guidance

Allah rewarded their monotheism with hidayah (guidance) and divine protection, preserving them during their sleep for centuries. This shows that Allah grants special status to those who uphold His Oneness, even in hostile environments.

c) Youth as a Symbol of Reform

Their age is significant: they were fitya (youths) — a Qur’anic archetype for people who challenge inherited wrong beliefs (as in the story of Ibrahim). Their youth highlights their courage in questioning societal norms, which is a virtue in Islam when aligned with truth and sincerity.

---

5. Relevance to Contemporary Discourse

The Ashab al-Kahf serve as a timeless symbol for believers, especially in situations of:

• Religious persecution

• Moral courage

• Commitment to monotheism against dominant social trends

Their story also addresses modern interfaith discussions. While many may see them as Christian figures (due to similarities with Christian hagiographies), the Qur'an reframes the story to focus not on labels (e.g., Christian, Jew, etc.), but on substance: belief in the One God, rejection of partners with Him, and devotion to divine guidance.

---

Conclusion

Yes, the Ashab al-Kahf were monotheists. The Qur’an presents them as sincere believers in the One true God, who rejected idolatry, took refuge in a cave to preserve their faith, and were rewarded by Allah with a miraculous sleep and an enduring legacy.

Their exact historical background — whether they were early Christians, Hanifs, or something else — is not the central point. The Qur’an deliberately avoids labeling them with a sectarian identity, instead affirming that what matters is belief in Allah’s oneness and rejection of shirk.

Thus, the Ashab al-Kahf stand as a Qur’anic emblem of pure monotheism, moral courage, and divine protection — a story that continues to inspire faith across generations.

Why Christian Zionism Is a Problem: A Critical Examination

Christian Zionism is a movement within certain segments of Christianity—particularly Evangelical Protestantism—that supports the modern state of Israel based on theological beliefs. Rooted in biblical interpretations that tie the Jewish people to the land of Israel, Christian Zionism has gained significant influence in both religious and political spheres, particularly in the United States.

While this movement may appear at first to be a purely religious conviction or an expression of solidarity with the Jewish people, Christian Zionism poses significant theological, political, and ethical problems. It contributes to instability in the Middle East, distorts Christian theology, and can even perpetuate injustice and violence under the guise of divine mandate.

1. Theological Problems: Distorted Biblical Interpretation

At the heart of Christian Zionism is a literalist and futurist reading of the Bible, particularly of the Old Testament and apocalyptic books like Daniel and Revelation. Christian Zionists believe that the establishment of the modern state of Israel in 1948 is the fulfillment of biblical prophecy, and a necessary step before the Second Coming of Christ.

However, this reading is highly selective and problematic:

• It conflates the modern secular state of Israel with ancient biblical Israel, ignoring vast theological developments in both Judaism and Christianity.

• It neglects the New Testament's redefinition of God's people—no longer a single ethnic group, but all who follow Christ, Jew or Gentile (Galatians 3:28–29).

• It reduces complex political realities to simplistic spiritual narratives, treating geopolitical events as steps in a divine script, rather than human affairs with real ethical consequences.

Many mainstream theologians across denominations reject Christian Zionism’s readings as poor exegesis that misunderstands the spirit of the Gospel, which emphasizes justice, mercy, and peace, not militarism or ethnic nationalism.

2. Ethical Issues: Supporting Injustice in the Name of God

Perhaps the most troubling aspect of Christian Zionism is its uncritical support for Israeli government policies, especially toward Palestinians. In many Christian Zionist circles, Palestinians—many of whom are fellow Christians—are seen as obstacles to prophecy, not as human beings deserving of dignity and rights.

This manifests in several ways:

• Support for settlement expansion and occupation, despite international law and widespread condemnation.

• Opposition to a two-state solution, because some believe all the land must belong to Israel to fulfill prophecy.

• Silence or dismissal of Palestinian suffering, including the displacement, dispossession, and military occupation that millions live under.

Christian Zionists may justify these stances by claiming they are “blessing Israel” (citing Genesis 12:3), but this often translates into blessing state power, not necessarily moral action. They end up siding with power over justice, and supporting actions that contradict core Christian values of peace, compassion, and solidarity with the oppressed.

3. Political Consequences: Undermining Peace in the Middle East

Christian Zionism has far-reaching political implications. In the United States, it has significantly shaped foreign policy through lobbying efforts, political endorsements, and massive financial support for pro-Israel causes.

This has contributed to:

• An imbalance in U.S. diplomacy, where American foreign policy appears aligned with one side of a deeply complex conflict.

• The erosion of international law, as illegal settlements and human rights abuses are ignored or excused.

• Fueling extremism, as narratives of divine entitlement embolden hardline actors on both sides.

Instead of encouraging peace and reconciliation, Christian Zionist rhetoric often promotes apocalyptic urgency, pushing for a future war (such as the “Battle of Armageddon”) as part of God’s plan. This eschatological fatalism discourages meaningful efforts at diplomacy and peacebuilding.

In short, Christian Zionism is not a neutral theology—it is a powerful ideological force with concrete consequences for millions of lives.

4. Anti-Judaism and Instrumentalization of Jewish People

Ironically, while Christian Zionists often express strong support for Jewish people and Israel, their theology is not necessarily philo-Semitic in substance. Many Christian Zionists believe that Jews must return to the land of Israel so that prophecies can be fulfilled, including a future mass conversion to Christianity or destruction in the End Times.

This raises deep concerns:

• Jewish people are instrumentalized—valued not for their dignity or faith, but as players in an eschatological drama.

• There is often little appreciation for Judaism as a living, diverse faith tradition, only a focus on its supposed role in Christian prophecy.

• In some cases, this leads to covert or overt missionary efforts, exploiting Jewish-Christian solidarity for conversion purposes.

Thus, Christian Zionism’s support for Jews is often conditional and theological, not ethical or relational. It reflects a theology of use, not one of respect or genuine interfaith engagement.

5. Betraying the Christian Witness

One of the most serious charges against Christian Zionism is that it compromises the Christian witness in the Holy Land and beyond.

Palestinian Christians—who have lived in the land since the time of Christ—are often ignored or delegitimized by Christian Zionist groups. Churches in Bethlehem, Jerusalem, and Gaza have consistently called for justice and peace, yet their voices are often dismissed as “anti-Israel” or “politicized.”

By aligning so strongly with one side of the conflict, Christian Zionists:

• Alienate fellow Christians, particularly in the Middle East.

• Damage the credibility of Christian witness, by appearing to endorse injustice and violence.

• Undermine Jesus’ message of peace and reconciliation, replacing it with a theology of conquest and triumphalism.

If Christians are called to be peacemakers (Matthew 5:9), then Christian Zionism must be critically re-evaluated for the ways it contributes to division, occupation, and injustice.

A Better Way Forward

Critiquing Christian Zionism is not the same as being anti-Israel or anti-Semitic. The problem is not support for Israel's right to exist, but rather support for oppressive policies and distorted theologies in the name of religion.

Many Jews, Christians, and Muslims work tirelessly for peace, justice, and coexistence in the Holy Land. A better Christian approach would:

• Support international law and human rights for all, Israelis and Palestinians alike.

• Promote dialogue between religions, rather than end-times prophecy as the basis of support.

• Center the voices of local Christians, especially those who suffer under occupation.

The Gospel calls Christians to act with compassion, humility, and love—not to become cheerleaders for nationalism or military power. A theology that supports walls, occupation, and war is not the theology of Jesus of Nazareth.

---

Conclusion

Christian Zionism may be popular in some circles, but it presents serious theological, ethical, and political problems. It distorts the message of Christianity, supports injustice under a religious guise, and contributes to the ongoing suffering in one of the world’s most volatile regions.

A true Christian response must be one that upholds human dignity, justice, and peace for all people, regardless of religion or ethnicity. Anything less is a betrayal of the faith it claims to defend.

Inside America’s Christian Zionist Movement and Its Support for Israel

Introduction

Few alliances in global geopolitics are as complex and deeply rooted in theology as the relationship between American Christian Zionists and the State of Israel. While U.S. foreign policy toward Israel has long enjoyed bipartisan support, a powerful and increasingly influential segment of American Evangelical Christians—known as Christian Zionists—has played a key role in shaping public and political attitudes in favor of Israel.

This movement is not merely political or strategic; it is theological. For Christian Zionists, the modern state of Israel is not just a nation-state; it is a fulfillment of Biblical prophecy, a key player in eschatological (end-times) narratives, and a divinely mandated actor in God's unfolding plan for humanity.

---

What Is Christian Zionism?

Christian Zionism is the belief among certain Christians, particularly within Evangelical and Fundamentalist circles, that the return of Jews to the Holy Land and the establishment of the State of Israel in 1948 is a fulfillment of Biblical prophecy. This view is rooted in a literal interpretation of the Bible, particularly passages in Genesis, Isaiah, Ezekiel, and Revelation.

At its core, Christian Zionism supports the Jewish people’s right to inhabit and control the land of Israel. However, this support is deeply tied to theological beliefs about the Second Coming of Christ, the rapture, and Armageddon.

The movement’s theological foundation often includes:

• Dispensationalism: A theological framework that divides history into distinct eras (or dispensations) of God's dealings with humanity. It posits that the Jews have a unique role in end-time events.

• Premillennialism: The belief that Christ will return before a literal thousand-year reign of peace, which will be preceded by the return of Jews to Israel and global tribulation.

---

Historical Roots

While Christian interest in the Holy Land dates back centuries, the modern Christian Zionist movement emerged in the 19th century, gaining momentum with figures like John Nelson Darby, a British preacher who developed Dispensationalist theology. American evangelists such as Dwight L. Moody and Cyrus Scofield, author of the Scofield Reference Bible, helped popularize these ideas in the U.S.

Support for Jewish restoration to Palestine existed among certain Protestants long before the establishment of the modern state of Israel. However, the founding of Israel in 1948 was seen by many Christian Zionists as the ultimate validation of their theological worldview.

By the late 20th century, the movement had grown significantly, particularly among white Evangelical Protestants, who saw Israel not only as a strategic ally but also as an instrument of divine prophecy.

---

The Political Rise of Christian Zionism

Christian Zionists began to assert real political influence in the 1970s and 1980s, especially under the Reagan administration, which was ideologically aligned with conservative Evangelical values. The movement gained further momentum with the rise of the Religious Right, which began to fuse Evangelical Christianity with conservative political activism.

A landmark moment came with the founding of the organization Christians United for Israel (CUFI) in 2006 by Pastor John Hagee, a prominent Texas-based televangelist. CUFI rapidly grew into one of the most influential Christian lobbying groups in Washington, claiming millions of members and significant access to policymakers.

Through rallies, fundraising, and political advocacy, CUFI and similar groups have strongly influenced U.S. policy toward Israel, often pushing for:

• Recognition of Jerusalem as Israel’s capital.

• Unwavering U.S. military and diplomatic support for Israel.

• Opposition to a two-state solution perceived to compromise Israel’s Biblical claims to the land.

• Encouragement of Jewish immigration (aliyah) to Israel as a fulfillment of prophecy.

---

Influence on U.S. Foreign Policy

The influence of Christian Zionism on American foreign policy was most visible during the administration of President Donald Trump. Evangelical advisors played key roles in decisions such as:

• The relocation of the U.S. Embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem in 2018.

• The recognition of Israeli sovereignty over the Golan Heights.

• Withdrawing from the Iran nuclear deal.

Trump's policies aligned almost perfectly with Christian Zionist agendas, and his Evangelical base—many of whom identify with Christian Zionist beliefs—viewed these moves as spiritually significant.

Such decisions were often presented by Christian leaders not just as political wins, but as steps towards fulfilling Biblical destiny.

---

Motivations: Theological vs. Political

While support for Israel among American Christians may appear purely political or moral, Christian Zionism is fundamentally theological. For adherents, the return of Jews to Israel is a prerequisite for the Second Coming of Christ.

Yet, this raises an important tension: Christian Zionists do not necessarily support Jewish religious autonomy or theology. In most end-times narratives embraced by Christian Zionists, the Jews will ultimately recognize Jesus as the Messiah. Some Jewish critics argue that this support is conditional and instrumental—valued only as a means to an end.

Others, including Jewish leaders who work closely with Christian Zionists, argue that such support—despite theological differences—is pragmatic and valuable, particularly in light of widespread support for Israel in Evangelical circles.

---

Criticism and Controversy

Christian Zionism is not without its critics. Opponents point to several concerns:

1. Theological Instrumentalism

Some argue that the movement reduces Jewish identity to a prophetic tool, rather than respecting Judaism as a faith in its own right.

2. Undermining Peace Efforts

By opposing land concessions or Palestinian statehood, Christian Zionists are often accused of exacerbating the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and opposing any resolution that doesn't align with their eschatological expectations.

3. Selective Morality

Critics contend that Christian Zionism shows unconditional support for the Israeli state, sometimes ignoring human rights concerns or the plight of Palestinian Christians and Muslims.

4. End-Times Obsession

The emphasis on apocalyptic prophecy can lead to dangerous fatalism in foreign policy—encouraging confrontation and viewing conflict in the Middle East as a divine necessity rather than a tragedy to be avoided.

Even within the broader Evangelical community, some theologians have pushed back against Christian Zionism, advocating instead for a "New Covenant theology" that sees the Church—not modern Israel—as the continuation of God’s promises.

---

Conclusion

America’s Christian Zionist movement is a powerful, complex, and sometimes controversial force in U.S.-Israel relations. Rooted in a blend of theology and politics, it sees the Jewish state not merely as a geopolitical ally, but as a central actor in God’s cosmic drama.

While this has led to robust political and financial support for Israel from millions of Evangelicals, it has also raised ethical and theological questions about the nature of that support—and its consequences for peace in the region.

As the Middle East remains a volatile flashpoint, the role of Christian Zionism in shaping American foreign policy and public opinion will likely remain a subject of intense debate—for both religious believers and secular policymakers alike.

Christian Zionism: Tracing the Lines of a Warmongering Heresy

In the complex intersection of religion and politics, few ideologies have wielded as much influence—while generating as much controversy—as Christian Zionism. Heralded by its proponents as a fulfillment of biblical prophecy and a support for the Jewish people, Christian Zionism has simultaneously been condemned by its critics as a dangerous, politically charged heresy that distorts Christian theology and fuels perpetual conflict in the Middle East.

To trace the lines of what many see as a warmongering heresy, one must begin by understanding its origins, theological premises, geopolitical entanglements, and the profound consequences it has had for both Christian witness and global peace.

---

Origins: A Theological Mutation

Christian Zionism did not emerge from the earliest Christian traditions. For nearly 1,800 years, the dominant view within Christianity—Catholic, Orthodox, and even most early Protestant interpretations—was that the Church had superseded Israel in God’s redemptive plan, a position known as supersessionism or replacement theology. While this position has its own historical baggage, particularly in terms of antisemitism, it did not support any political or territorial claims for modern Israel.

The roots of Christian Zionism lie in the 19th-century Protestant world, particularly among British and American evangelicals influenced by dispensationalism—a theological system popularized by John Nelson Darby and later by the Scofield Reference Bible. Dispensationalists read the Bible as a series of “dispensations” or historical eras in which God deals differently with humanity. In this schema, the Jews remain God's chosen people, and the modern state of Israel is viewed as the fulfillment of biblical prophecy—specifically a precursor to the Second Coming of Christ.

This theological mutation transformed Christianity into an ideological instrument for modern Zionism. In effect, it gave rise to a religious doctrine that identified political Israel with biblical Israel, and military victories with divine favor.

---

Theology: Prophecy, Politics, and a Militarized Messiah

At the heart of Christian Zionism is a selective, literalist interpretation of Scripture. Passages like Genesis 12:3 (“I will bless those who bless you”) and Ezekiel 37 (the vision of the dry bones) are reinterpreted as endorsements of unconditional political support for Israel, regardless of its actions.

In this worldview:

• The rebirth of Israel in 1948 is seen as a divine act.

• The expansion of Israeli territory, including the West Bank and Jerusalem, is considered part of God’s plan.

• The return of Jews to the land is a necessary precursor to the Second Coming.

• Any opposition to Israel, especially from Muslims or Palestinians, is seen as opposing God Himself.

This theology has drastic implications. It not only justifies occupation, displacement, and war, but sacralizes them. Peace efforts are often viewed with suspicion or even as rebellion against divine prophecy. Some Christian Zionists openly oppose any two-state solution, arguing that the land was given to the Jews “by God” and must not be compromised.

Moreover, Jesus is implicitly recast—not as the Prince of Peace—but as a militarized Messiah who will return only after Israel defeats its enemies. This vision has more in common with apocalyptic nationalism than with the Sermon on the Mount.

---

Political Power: From Theology to Foreign Policy

Christian Zionism is not merely a theological issue; it has become a political force of enormous consequence, particularly in the United States. Millions of American evangelicals subscribe to this belief system, forming a significant voting bloc that has shaped U.S. foreign policy in the Middle East for decades.

Organizations like Christians United for Israel (CUFI), led by Pastor John Hagee, boast millions of members and direct lines to political leaders. Their message is simple: support for Israel is not just political—it is spiritual obedience. This has led to:

• Massive financial and military aid to Israel, regardless of human rights concerns.

• Uncritical support for Israeli policies, including settlement expansion and the Gaza blockade.

• Opposition to Palestinian statehood or meaningful peace negotiations.

• Demonization of Muslims, often under the guise of combating “Islamic terrorism.”

Under this framework, wars in the Middle East—whether in Iraq, Syria, or Iran—are often interpreted as prophetic battles, paving the way for Armageddon. This is why critics call Christian Zionism not just misguided, but warmongering: it spiritually romanticizes war as divine necessity.

---

Ethical and Theological Critiques

Many Christian theologians across denominations have sharply criticized Christian Zionism on both ethical and theological grounds.

1. Distortion of the Gospel

Christian Zionism subverts the universal message of the Gospel by privileging one ethnic group and one nation-state as the centerpiece of God’s plan. This undermines the radical inclusivity preached by Christ, who said His kingdom was “not of this world” (John 18:36). It replaces the cross with the flag, and grace with geopolitics.

2. Instrumentalization of the Jewish People

Ironically, Christian Zionism often uses Jews as instruments, not ends in themselves. The support it offers Israel is frequently conditional—not based on solidarity or shared values, but on an eschatological timeline in which Jews must return to the land, rebuild the Temple, and eventually convert or face divine judgment. This manipulative dynamic has led some Jewish thinkers to describe Christian Zionist support as “philo-Semitism with an expiration date.”

3. Neglect of Justice and Peacemaking

Christian Zionism tends to ignore or downplay the suffering of Palestinians—both Christian and Muslim. It offers no serious theology of justice, reconciliation, or peacemaking. This stands in direct contrast to the prophetic tradition of Scripture, which calls for care for the oppressed, the foreigner, and the poor (Micah 6:8, Isaiah 1:17).

Christian Zionism’s silence—or worse, complicity—in the face of occupation, displacement, and violence is a betrayal of Christ’s call to love one’s neighbor and to be peacemakers.

---

The Palestinian Church: A Forgotten Witness

Perhaps the most damning indictment of Christian Zionism is that it erases Palestinian Christians, who have lived in the Holy Land since the time of Christ. Denominations like the Greek Orthodox, Melkite, and Latin Catholic churches have existed for centuries in places like Bethlehem, Ramallah, and Jerusalem.

Yet in the Christian Zionist narrative, these indigenous Christians are often ignored, marginalized, or accused of theological error—simply because they do not align with Zionist ideology. The witness of these churches—who call for peace, justice, and reconciliation—is one of the most overlooked voices in global Christianity today.

---

Conclusion: A Call for Prophetic Clarity

Christian Zionism, in its current form, is a theological error with devastating political consequences. It distorts Scripture, hijacks Christian eschatology, and fosters a mindset in which violence is holy and peace is suspect. It is, in the words of many Christian ethicists, a heresy—not just in abstract theological terms, but in its betrayal of Christ’s message of love, justice, and peace.

To challenge Christian Zionism is not to oppose the Jewish people or deny Israel's right to exist. Rather, it is to reject a theology that instrumentalizes both Jews and Palestinians in a political drama that has little to do with the Gospel of Christ.

In an age of war, displacement, and religious extremism, the Church must choose: will it be a cheerleader for empire, or a prophetic voice for peace? The legacy of Jesus leaves no ambiguity.

---

Further Reading:

• Stephen Sizer, Christian Zionism: Roadmap to Armageddon?

• Naim Ateek, Justice and Only Justice: A Palestinian Theology of Liberation

• Gary Burge, Whose Land? Whose Promise?